Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

  1. Site: The Catholic Thing
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Karen Popp

    Life on a small organic farm in northeastern Pennsylvania in the cool early days of spring, adapting to the rhythms of planting, livestock care, and chores, can sound blissful to anyone buffeted by adult pressures and responsibilities. Carmina Chapp hopes you think that. She and her husband, Larry Chapp, both Oblates of St. Benedict, established the farm in 2013 with the goal of providing food for soup kitchens and food pantries, as well as to be a place of contemplation for visitors encouraged to follow Benedictine spirituality.
     

     

     

    The post Dorothy Day inspires Pennsylvania’s Catholic Worker Farm appeared first on The Catholic Thing.

  2. Site: The Catholic Thing
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Karen Popp

    In Dignitas inifinita (Infinite Dignity), the Vatican issued a strong warning yesterday against “gender theory.” The document, approved by Pope Francis, says any sex-change surgery risks threatening “the unique dignity” of a person. It also focuses on various other threats, including poverty, the death penalty, war, assisted suicide, abortion, sexual abuse, and the abuse of women. The text states that attempts to obscure “the sexual difference between man and woman” must be rejected.
     

    The post Vatican: ‘Gender-affirming’ surgery, surrogacy, and gender theory threaten human dignity appeared first on The Catholic Thing.

  3. Site: The Catholic Thing
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Robert Royal

    Reading the Declaration on Human Dignity (“Infinite Dignity”), issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) yesterday, reminds me of an old teacher-student story. A student submits an assigned essay, and the teacher returns it with the comment, “What you’ve written here is both good and new. Unfortunately, what’s good in it is not new, and what’s new is not. . .” But let’s break off the story there. And following the Christian rule of charity in all things, say of the Declaration, what’s new in it is . . . yet to be determined.

    Because in roughly the first half of its sixty-six paragraphs, the document seeks to situate itself in line with recent popes and classical Catholic teaching. It cites Paul VI, JPII, Benedict, Francis (about half the citations, of course). And in a footnote even reaches back to Leo XIII, Piuses XI & XII, and the Vatican II documents Dignitatis humanae and Gaudium et spes. At the press conference introducing the Declaration, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, head of the DDF, made a point of opening with the observation that the very title of the text came from a 1980 speech St. John Paul gave to a handicapped group in Osnabrück, Germany. Indeed, said the Cardinal, it’s not by chance that the document is even officially dated April 2, the 19th anniversary of JPII’s death.

    All of this cannot help but make the alert reader think that the drafters – and those who approved the final text – wanted to frontload ample exculpatory evidence against any objections that might follow.

    And inevitably, objections will. Because in several respects this apotheosis of human dignity raises more questions than it settles. (“Infinite” human dignity in JPII’s hands was one thing; now, it may mean something very different.)

    It’s good to have a document, however, that affirms two fundamental Biblical notions “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him.” Hence, “infinite” dignity. And propers to Cardinal Fernández that he emphasized during the presentation “male and female he created them.”

    But much of the world already believes in human dignity and freedom well beyond those limits and responsibilities. And the takeaway from all this talk – what’s communicated as opposed to what’s actually said – may be quite different than the actual words.

    On the one hand, it’s repeatedly affirmed that there’s an ontological dignity to every human being from conception to natural death. (Ontological, here, means it’s built into our very being and nature by God and therefore “cannot be lost.”)

    So far so good.

    But there are other kinds of dignity – moral, social, existential as the Declaration properly recognizes. These may exist to a greater or lesser, proper or improper degree. Morally bad acts, for example, are not only an affront to the human dignity of others. They diminish our own moral dignity – and freedom – though never, we are told repeatedly, to the point that we lose our ontological dignity.

    This leads to a certain lack of Catholic realism – even basic consistency – in some of the arguments in the second half of the document. To be fair, specific matters were left in brief, general terms – something the Cardinal says was done deliberately to keep the document relatively short.

    Adam and Eve by the workshop of Giovanni della Robbia, c. 1515 [Walters Art Museum, Baltimore]

    Still, this leads to oddities. For some reason, for example, intrinsic dignity is the reason the death penalty is no longer “admissible.” But not only has it been seen since the early days of the Church as “admissible” (on this see the definitive  work by Joseph Bessette and Edward Feser). Capital punishment has even been valued at times as a matter of justice – and human dignity – for both perpetrator and victim. It takes human wrongs seriously in the way they are punished.

    The Declaration also affirms the right of self-defense, but goes on: “We can no longer think of war as a solution because its risks will probably always be greater than its supposed benefits. In view of this, it is very difficult nowadays to invoke the rational criteria elaborated in earlier centuries to speak of the possibility of a ‘just war.’”

    Yet Ukraine is fighting a just war. And it won’t be the last one – until human wickedness leaves the earth.

    The problem is not only about the arguments. There’s also a question about what the Church has recently done. For example, the Declaration speaks eloquently about violence against women. Yet when two women decided finally to come forward publicly about Fr. Marko Rupnik, a friend of the pope’s and a former Jesuit, who close to two dozen women have claimed abused them sexually (including some rituals that can only be called satanic), appropriate action didn’t follow. Fr. Rupnik still functions as a priest in Rome.

    The Declaration also asserts with some force in opposition to gender theory:

    it intends to deny the greatest possible difference that exists between living beings: sexual difference. This foundational difference is not only the greatest imaginable difference but is also the most beautiful and most powerful of them. In the male-female couple, this difference achieves the most marvelous of reciprocities. It thus becomes the source of that miracle that never ceases to surprise us: the arrival of new human beings in the world.

    Yet this affirmation in theory comes into no little conflict with how the Church has recently acted in practice. In his oral presentation, for example, the Cardinal pointed not merely to the teachings of Francis, but his attitudes and behavior towards all people, a matter of welcoming and respect. This has been a constant – and often confusing – feature of his papacy.

    On the one hand, we have the right understanding of gender theory. On the other, the pope meets with Fr. James Martin and the leaders of New Ways Ministries, who clearly are advocates for points on the spectrum of gender theory, and has (incredibly) described them as practicing “the style of God.”

    Francis has no difficulty castigating priests in general, even psychoanalyzing, at a distance, the ones he regards as “rigid.” But where’s the will, when it’s hard, to evangelize, to confront, to urge repentance? Precisely on the difficult issues. It’s easy to denounce war, human trafficking, environmental damage, violence against women, surrogacy, etc. Much harder to enter the fray where the Church is most needed.

    Affirming human dignity will not stop the raids of the rainbow warriors, Trans Visibility Day on Easter, two gay pride months, or Drag Queen Story Hours for children. The only thing with a chance of rolling back these destructive threats to human dignity is a Church in a much more militant stance.

    And despite some encouraging words,  there’s little real  fight in the Declaration, especially given the current moment, when militant activists of various stripes need to be not just observed and classified, but effectively resisted. Even driven back, for the very sake of human dignity.

    Yes, explain why all these things harm human dignity, as the document does well enough. While the explaining continues, however – contradicted by the indiscriminate “welcoming” – children are being mutilated, families torn asunder, marriage sidelined, populations are shrinking. And one can easily imagine the takeaway for those with a will to misunderstand. And not entirely in error. As with the “Who am I to judge?” fiasco, the message being transmitted to many in our culture, despite the actual words, will likely be to say, “Pope Francis says that I’ve got intrinsic – infinite – dignity. Back off, man.”

    The post A Dignity Still to be Determined appeared first on The Catholic Thing.

  4. Site: AntiWar.com
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Ron Paul

    Even Republican stalwarts like current Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are starting to notice that something is shifting in the party. While McConnell announced recently that he would step down as Republican leader in the US Senate, in an interview last week he was adamant that he would continue to serve out his term in … Continue reading "McConnell Cannot Stop the Non-Interventionist Tide"

    The post McConnell Cannot Stop the Non-Interventionist Tide appeared first on Antiwar.com.

  5. Site: The Unz Review
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Gregory Hood
  6. Site: The Unz Review
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Jonathan Cook
    The isolation of Gaza is almost complete. The laws of war have been torn up and the enclave is now completely at Israel’s mercy After six months – and many tens of thousands of dead and maimed Palestinian women and children later – western commentators are finally wondering whether something may be amiss with Israel’s...
  7. Site: AntiWar.com
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Fred Reed

    If you are a young man wondering what to do with your life, you may consider enlisting in the military. Don’t. Yes, the military has its appeal, or seems to. You may need a job. The uniform looks good. There can be adventure. You might get laid by Asian lovelies in foreign countries.  These things … Continue reading "Enlisting in the Military: A Very, Very Bad Idea"

    The post Enlisting in the Military: A Very, Very Bad Idea appeared first on Antiwar.com.

  8. Site: AntiWar.com
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Ted Snider

    NATO is less a defensive alliance than it is a provocative alliance. A quarter of a century ago, the Soviet Union dismantled itself by its own will. With that titanic change, NATO’s sole purpose dissolved. Created to defend its members from a Soviet threat, NATO now self-perpetuated its extinct purpose by provoking the very threat … Continue reading "Ukraine in NATO: What Blinken Says Versus What Blinken Means"

    The post Ukraine in NATO: What Blinken Says Versus What Blinken Means appeared first on Antiwar.com.

  9. Site: The Unz Review
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Paul Craig Roberts
    oman Balmakov of EpochTV is the best news presenter in the business. In this 13 minute video Balmakov reports successes from the use of Ivermectin in cancer treatment. As I reported during the 3 years of orchestrated Covid hysteria, both HCQ and Ivermectin are preventers and cures of Covid. The medical authorities knew this, but...
  10. Site: The Unz Review
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Andrew Anglin
    Bibi did not miss a beat after the world flipped out over the soup kitchen massacre. He’s pushing straight forward to the next big slaughter. You have to have a certain level of respect for the way this man is willing to piss in the face of the entire world, and just keep on killing...
  11. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Insurers Spy On Houses Via Aerial Imagery, Seeking Reasons To Cancel Coverage

    Insurance companies across the country are using satellites, drones, manned airplanes and even high-altitude balloons to spy on properties they cover with homeowners policies -- and using the findings to drop customers, often without giving any opportunity to address alleged shortcomings. 

    “We’ve seen a dramatic increase across the country in reports from consumers who’ve been dropped by their insurers on the basis of an aerial image,” United Policyholders executive director Amy Bach tell the Wall Street Journal. Reasons can range from shoddy roofing to yard clutter and undeclared trampolines.  

    Much of this surveillance is done via the Geospatial Insurance Consortium, which boasts of its coverage of 99% of the US population.

    The Geospatial Insurance Consortium provides imagery insurers use to study roof condition and look for risky property attributes (via GIC)

    In pitching its ability to provide high-resolution "imagery and insights" for property reviews, GIC says insurers can use the service to "review risk and exposure on a building such as proximity of vegetation to the structure, whether a roof needs updating, and verify the exact location for a policy." 

    “If your roof is 20 years old and one hailstorm is going to take it off, you should pay more than somebody with a brand new roof,” Allstate CEO Tom Willson told the Journal, unapologetically and ominously adding that, where the company's use of digital imagery is concerned, "there's even more to come." 

    Wilson framed aerial spying as a pricing issue, but many consumers are finding that companies are using it to suddenly drop their coverage altogether. 

    The Journal describes the experience of northern California resident Cindy Picos, who was dropped by CSAA Insurance last month, with the company saying aerial imagery revealed that her roof had aged beyond its life expectancy. She paid for an inspection of her own, which found the roof was good for another decade. CSAA wasn't impressed, and said its decision was final. The firm also refused to share its photos, though it now says it's changed that policy and will let customers see them -- if they ask. 

    Another Californian, CJ Sveen, was dropped by AAA Homeowners Insurance after their reconnaissance discovered "clutter" in his yard. An indignant Sveen told ABC7 that he uses his yard as a workshop "Apparently they have some pictures and they noticed clutter. I find that offensive. How dare you judge me because of my stuff!"

    In AAA's defense, clutter isn't just about aesthetics. It could present a fire hazard, attract rodents that harm the structure, present a physical danger to visitors, and obstruct firefighters' ability to quickly contain a fire at the premises. 

    Would you cover this house? CJ Sveen's homeowners policy was cancelled after aerial imagery captured clutter in his yard

    Another California couple had their policy torn up by AAA after overhead photography found their swimming pool had been drained. The aging pair said they emptied it because their grandchildren had grown up and they no longer used it. Empty pools are prone to cracking for lack of counter-pressure from water; they can also "float" up from the earth, creating hazardous conditions. 

    Former Michigan Farmers Insurance agent Nichole Brink told the Journal she quit the company last year over her concern that it was aggressively using aerial imagery to chase off customers, and even using shots that were two or three years old. "It’s like they’re using anything as an excuse to get people off their books,” she said. Farmers says it gives policyholders at least 60 days to challenge the company's findings or remedy shortcomings.

    It's probably no coincidence that Californians are frequently targeted for non-renewal via overhead spy technology. Insurers are aggressively paring back their business in the state, as the state's thicket of regulations has blocked insurers' ability to adequately charge for coverage in a state cursed by wildfires and earthquakes.  

    Last year, for example, State Farm said it would no longer issue new homeowners policies in the Golden State. The, in March, the company took the more draconian step of opting not to renew 72,000 property and commercial apartment policies. AIG bailed on the state in 2022. 

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 23:20
  12. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Lara Trump: RNC Focused Like A Laser On Election Integrity

    Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Republican National Committee (RNC) co-chair Lara Trump said Sunday that election integrity is a top priority in the upcoming November election and the committee is focused on it “like a laser.”

    Lara Trump speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Md., on Feb. 28, 2020. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

    During an interview with Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” on April 7, Ms. Trump said that the committee will dedicate all of its resources to its Election Integrity Division “as needed.”

    When you talk about election integrity, it is vital. It is the number one thing that we are focused on, aside from getting out the vote, which, of course, Donald Trump himself will do for us,” Ms. Trump said.

    “We are making sure that we leave nothing to chance because we have to understand the importance of this election,” she added.

    Former President Donald Trump raked in a massive $50.5 million in funds for his reelection bid on Saturday. With this funding, Ms. Trump, the daughter-in-law of President Trump, said the RNC can now afford to ensure that poll workers are trained and lawyers are present in every voting precinct.

    “Prior to last night, the largest single event fundraiser in politics ever was the one that Joe Biden had. And he needed three presidents to haul in $26 million,” she said, referring to President Biden’s fundraiser in March, which included former presidents Barrack Obama and Bill Clinton.

    We needed one man, Donald J. Trump, one president, to double that,” Ms. Trump added.

    Ms. Trump said that the outcome of this fundraiser event reflects a shift where “people are not sitting on the sidelines anymore.”

    “They understand what’s at stake. It’s a must-win election. And from the election integrity perspective, we’re focused on it like a laser at the RNC,” she added.

    RNC Co-chair Lara Trump told Maria Bartiromo this morning that President Trump will be holding another big-haul fundraiser next week, this time in Georgia.

    Trump also spoke about the critical issue of election integrity.
    . pic.twitter.com/u5KeUrSGnt

    — Paul Villarreal (AKA Vince Manfeld) (@AureliusStoic1) April 7, 2024

    Under a joint-fundraising agreement, funds from the fundraiser event will go to the Trump campaign, the former president’s Save America PAC, the RNC, and state GOP parties.

    RNC chair Michael Whatley, who was also present for the interview, said the committee will spend “every dollar” raised on two “critical core” missions: increasing voter turnout and protecting the ballot.

    Mr. Whatley said that the RNC is working with state legislatures, boards of elections, and secretaries of state to ensure the implementation of the rules of the road.

    The committee will file lawsuits if the rules are not adhered to, he said, adding that the RNC had filed over 80 lawsuits in 24 states “to make sure that we have the ground ready to go for safe elections.”

    The committee has also been recruiting and training thousands of observers and attorneys “to make sure that we are in the room” when a vote is cast and counted, Mr. Whatley said.

    Michael Whatley, speaks before former President Donald Trump's arrival for a rally in Greensboro, N.C., on March 2, 2024. (Jonathan Drake/Reuters)

    “What we want are fair, accurate, secure, and transparent elections. And when we have it, then we’re going to protect the sanctity of that ballot. We’re going to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat,” he added.

    President Trump’s campaign’s fundraiser, dubbed the “Inaugural Leadership Dinner,” was held in hedge fund billionaire John Paulson’s $110 million home in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday.

    Thie event is a much-needed boost for President Trump, who has been routinely outraised by President Biden amid a financial squeeze due to ballooning lawyer fees and legal payouts from his criminal and civil court cases.

    Mr. Paulson told The Epoch Times on Saturday that the event has now claimed the position of being the most successful political fundraiser in U.S. history.

    This sold-out event has raised the most in a single political fundraiser in history. This overwhelming support demonstrates the enthusiasm for President Trump and his policies,” he remarked.

    Melanie Sun, Janice Hisle, and Reuter contributed to this report.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 23:00
  13. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    China Paid $250,000 To "Threat Actors" In Canada In 2018 And 2019

    A new document given to Canada's Foreign Interference Commission suggests that Chinese officials may have offered $250,000 to "threat actors" in 2018 and 2019, according to a new report from The Globe and Mail

    The Canadian Security Intelligence Service document on election interference said that prior to and during the 2019 election “a group of known and suspected People’s Republic of China related threat actors in Canada, including PRC officials, worked in loose coordination with one another to covertly advance PRC interests though Canadian democratic institutions.”

    “Some of these threat actors received financial support from the PRC,” and says “reporting indicated that 11 political candidates and 13 political staff members were assessed to be either implicated in or impacted by this group of threat actors," the document says. 

    The report suggests the $250,000 from Chinese officials in Canada was likely for foreign interference rather than political donations.

    It describes the complex routing of these funds through various individuals to mask their origin, eventually reaching a staff member of a 2019 federal election candidate and an Ontario MPP, via an influential community leader, the Mail wrote.

    According to the document, the implicated candidates include seven Liberals and four Conservatives, with some knowingly participating in foreign interference activities, while others were oblivious due to the secretive nature of the operations.

    The federal government initiated the Foreign Interference Commission inquiry in September, led by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue, in response to reports by The Globe and Mail on Chinese interference in Canadian democracy.

    The inquiry, which took place on Thursday, featured testimonies from senior officials of CSIS, the RCMP, the Department of Global Affairs, and the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), Canada's electronic intelligence agency.

    Dan Rogers, a former CSE official and now the deputy national security adviser, revealed the CSE had intelligence post-2021 election about alleged fund distributions, which was shared with the RCMP and CSIS, though specifics weren't disclosed. RCMP Commissioner Michael Duheme stated that no criminal investigations into foreign interference were opened for the 2019 or 2021 elections, as no intelligence received warranted such actions.

    However, an investigation into foreign interference was launched following the last general election when Conservative MP Michael Chong reported being targeted by China.

    Too bad the Biden family doesn't do business in Canada - the PRC probably could have gotten influence a lot easier that way, though it may have cost a bit more due to the need to support Hunter's "lifestyle" and "social agenda".

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 22:40
  14. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    FDA Finally Takes Down Ivermectin Posts After Settlement

    Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Social media posts urging people not to take ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 have been taken down by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    The FDA removed posts from X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn that stated: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously y'all. Stop it.”

    The posts had remained up even after the regulatory agency agreed to take them down as part of a settlement in a legal case brought by doctors who said the posts wrongly interfered with their practice of medicine.

    The March 21 settlement said the FDA would take down specific posts within 21 days. The posts were made in August 2021.

    The FDA has also deleted the following posts:

    • An Aug. 21, 2021, Instagram post that said: “You are not a horse. Stop it with the #ivermectin. It’s not authorized for treating #COVID.”

    • An April 26, 2022, Twitter post that said: “Hold your horses ya'll. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

    The posts directed people to an FDA webpage titled, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” The page itself acknowledged that the FDA has approved ivermectin for some uses but said “taking a drug for an unapproved use can be very dangerous” and “currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.”

    The agency pointed to a database of clinical trials testing ivermectin against COVID-19; some of the trials showed the drug works against the illness.

    Doctors commonly prescribe FDA-approved drugs for a range of purposes, including some outside the scope of approval. The practice is known as off-label prescription.

    The FDA’s ivermectin posts gained tremendous traction across social media and news outlets, prompting internal excitement, emails obtained by The Epoch Times showed. Millions of people saw the posts. “That was great! Even I saw it!” Dr. Janet Woodcock, the agency’s acting commissioner at the time, said in one missive.

    The FDA has not alerted its followers on social media that it removed the posts.

    2022, celebrated the development.

    The case “sets an important legal precedent which should deter them from attempting this stunt again anytime soon,” she wrote on X. In another post, she said that “the terms we were asking for were met when we agreed to settle” and “we were not optimistic about what we would get in discovery.”

    But while the posts and page have been removed, the FDA has created a new page about ivermectin and COVID-19.

    Published on April 5, it states: “One of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s jobs is to carefully evaluate the scientific data on a drug to be sure that it is both safe and effective for a particular use. There continues to be interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals.”

    The page repeats the statement that “the FDA has determined that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID 19 in humans,” but lacks the link to the database showing mixed results from trials.

    The page also says that “health care professionals may choose to prescribe or use an approved human drug for an unapproved use when they judge that the unapproved use is medically appropriate for an individual patient.”

    An FDA spokesperson previously told The Epoch Times that the settlement was not an admission of a violation of law or any other wrongdoing.

    FDA has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19,“ the spokesperson said. ”The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.”

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 22:20
  15. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    LA 'Mansion Tax' Is Yet Another Democrat Debacle

    In November 2022, Los Angeles voters approved a so-called 'mansion tax,' which slaps a 4% sales tax on properties sold for over $5 million, and 5.5% for those over $10 million.

    The scheme (Measure ULA), put forward by Democrats, was projected to raise roughly $672 million in its first year, to be used for affordable housing.

    Not only did the plan fall short by hundreds of millions of dollars (raising just $215 million), the measure caused residential building construction to plummet, raising housing prices even further, the Washington Examiner writes, noting that the tax doesn't just apply to large homes in Bel Air, "but also gas stations, commercial real estate, condominiums, and apartment complexes."

    Los Angeles real estate brokers say the $5 million threshold means the new ULA tax will hit just about any apartment complex with over 15 housing units. This has discouraged lenders from offering mortgages on, and developers from building, the very multifamily projects the city needs more of to reduce housing costs. Since nearly two-thirds of homes in Los Angeles have asking prices of at least $1 million, working-class families must often rent multifamily homes to live in. CoStar analyst Ryan Patap noted that developers are further discouraged by the city’s “broader political shift in the city that’s more supportive of restrictions on landlords and more supportive of protections for tenants.”

    Around the state as a whole, multifamily housing has trended above the national average. Whereas new multifamily housing permit authorization fell nationally by nearly 19% from 2022 to 2023, California’s only decreased by 5%. But in Los Angeles County, authorizations dropped by 19%, and in LA city, they slumped by a staggering 24%. The mansion tax appears to be to blame. -Washington Examiner

    City officials are still slapping themselves on the back, bragging that $150 million from Measure ULA revenues have helped fund programs for short-term emergency rental assistance (for whom?), as well as tenant outreach and education, tenant protections, defense against evictions (squatter defense?), direct cash assistance for low-income seniors and people with disabilities.

    "The pace at which ULA is generating revenue, especially over the last quarter, is impressive," reads a statement from Joan Ling, a real estate adviser and policy analyst in urban planning who is also the lead author of a report from UCLA, USC, and Occidental College recapping ULA's first year.

    "ULA is enabling Los Angeles to finally meet the big structural challenges driving our housing crisis—like the skyrocketing costs of land and construction—so that we can build more homes more quickly."

    That said, as the Examiner concludes:

    Supporters have bragged that the legislation has already funded $23 million on eviction protection and tenant outreach and $28 million on aid to distressed tenants and landlords, but neither of these programs do anything actually to lower rents for working families.

    The real protection Angeleno tenants need is from a Democratic Party that is constantly passing new regulations and higher taxes that make new home and apartment construction more expensive. Until Los Angeles voters start electing leaders whose motto is “Build baby build,” they can only expect their existing housing crisis to get worse.

    Indeed.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 22:00
  16. Site: RT - News
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    The US is losing its influence in the region to China and Russia, according to an Al-Monitor/Premise survey

    Moscow and Beijing are already playing more important roles in the Middle East and North Africa than ten years ago, and in another decade could rival Washington’s influence in the region, according to a recent opinion poll.

    The poll was conducted by Al-Monitor in partnership with data analytics firm Premise across Egypt, Türkiye, Iraq and Tunisia between March 4 and March 22, 2024, and questioned 2,670 respondents in the four states about their views on power dynamics in the region.

    When asked which of the three world leaders they viewed “most favorably,” some 44.4% chose Russian President Vladimir Putin, followed by Chinese President Xi Jinping with some 33.8%, while only 21.7% said they preferred US President Joe Biden.

    Putin was seen more favorably across all four states, most of all in Egypt (51.6%). Biden was slightly more popular in Iraq (29.2%) of all states, but still polled third after Putin (35.5%) and Xi (35.3%).

    Al-Monitor suggested that Washington’s popularity suffered due to its support of Israel’s war in Gaza, but noted that a multitude of other factors could be influencing opinions. The respondents were almost split on whether Washington (30%) or Moscow (28%) could “most successfully mediate political disagreements in the Middle East.” However, over 40% agreed that the US was still “best equipped to help resolve the Israel-Hamas war,” compared to Russia’s 27.9% and China’s 13.4%.

    Read more RT 58% of Americans believe Biden not respected by world leaders – survey

    Almost half of respondents saw Russia (49.5%) and China (47.9%) playing “more important regional roles” than 10 years ago, while only 37.1% could say the same about the US. In another decade, Beijing (28.9%) would rival Washington (29%) as the “most influential” in the Middle East, they said.

    Those polled said they would like their governments to “forge closer ties” with Beijing (43.2%) and Moscow (39.7%), while only 29.7% sought more cooperation with Washington. Almost two-thirds of participants believe Chinese economic investment has had a positive impact on their country, while 52.3% saw positives in economic cooperation with Russia. The US economic investment was seen as positive by 39.7%, while 29.8% reported negatives.

  17. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "This Is Crazy": Fetterman Tears Into 'Squatters Rights' Laws, Soft-On-Crime Policies

    Authored by Stephen Katte via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) has blasted the idea of “squatter’s rights,” questioning the laws that allow interlopers on a property to claim ownership over its rightful owner, calling it a case of “just breaking the law.”

    U.S. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) walks toward the Senate Chambers in Washington, D.C., on March 23, 2024. (Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

    Squatter rights laws allow anyone illegally occupying another person’s property to claim ownership if they are not evicted after a certain amount of time. Also known as adverse possession laws, these laws are in effect in all 50 U.S. states but enforcement differs significantly.

    In an April 6 interview with The New York Post, Mr. Fetterman said he had extensive experience with these laws while he was mayor of Braddock in Pennsylvania. In some cases, they can come into effect after only 30 days of illegally occupying a building.

    It’s wild that if you go away on a long trip, for 30 days, and someone breaks into your home and suddenly, they have rights,” he said.

    This is crazy. Like if somebody stole your car, and then they held it for 30 days, then somehow you now have some rights?” he added.

    According to law experts who have spoken with The Epoch Times, police can’t help because it’s a civil matter. Under these laws, the only way to remove a squatter claiming ownership is through an eviction lawsuit, which can drag on for months or years because housing courts are severely backlogged at the moment.

    Squatter’s rights as they exist today can be traced back to the Homestead Act of 1862, which allowed settlers to claim land in the western United States under the agreement they would improve it and live on it for at least five years. Over time, the concept of squatter’s rights have expanded well beyond land claims.

    According to Mr. Fetterman, “Squatters have no rights,” and during his time as Mayor, he always tried to “push back against that.”

    Another expert speaking to The Epoch Times claimed illegal immigrants could further exacerbate the squatter rights issue, although he noted he had yet to see this transpire.

    Border Patrol has encountered more than 7.6 million illegal immigrants trying to cross the border since President Joe Biden took office in January 2021. Many have come seeking asylum and various jurisdictions around the country are struggling to keep up with the influx of people, stretching resources to their limits in some cases, such as in Texas, Arizona, and New York.

    Fetterman Says US Needs to Be Smart and Aggressive on Crime

    Soft crime policies are being blamed for the fatal shooting of NYPD Detective Jonathan Diller during a traffic stop in Queens last month. According to authorities, Guy Rivera, who was accused of the crime, has at least 21 prior arrests for drug and assault related offenses.

    Mr. Fetterman says he has no issue giving second chances to offenders who have made a mistake. But 20 chances is pushing it too far.

    “If you have those kinds of established records, it doesn’t serve any greater goal to allow people that are offending, offending, offending and allow them to not be held accountable,” he said.

    “If this individual is convicted, then he should spend the rest of his life in prison and never have an opportunity to get out,” he added.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 21:40
  18. Site: AntiWar.com
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Margaret Griffis

    Two more were wounded.

    The post <I>Iraq Weekly Roundup</I>: Seven Killed appeared first on Antiwar.com.

  19. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Biden Scrambles To Buy Votes With New Taxpayer-Funded Student Debt Relief Scheme

    After American borrowers adjusted their finances amid the mass-suspension of student loan payments during the pandemic (and the scorching inflation that followed), the Biden administration on Monday announced new student loan plans that would give borrowers up to $20,000 in loan forgiveness for balances that have grown due to unpaid interest since entering repayment, regardless of income.

    The plan is aimed at those with "runaway interest."

    Those who qualify for the "SAVE IDR" (income-driven repayment) would have the full balance of their unpaid interest forgiven, which would benefit roughly 25 million Americans.

    What's more, the administration is also looking to provide automatic debt relief for those who qualify under the SAVE plan, Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, and similar forgiveness programs which have hit red tape when it comes to relief.

    Lastly, the plan would give relief to those enrolled in low-financial-value education programs deemed insufficient by the Department of Education, as well as those experiencing hardship in paying back loans and who are at risk of default.

    I said I wouldn't back down from using every tool at our disposal to get student loan borrowers the relief they need.

    That's why today we're announcing new plans that, if implemented, would cancel student debt for millions more. pic.twitter.com/rNiCxzzlU3

    — President Biden (@POTUS) April 8, 2024

    "The Biden-Harris Administration plans to release proposed rules on these plans over the coming months. If these plans are finalized as proposed, this fall the Administration would begin canceling up to $20,000 in interest for millions of borrowers and full loan forgiveness for millions more," the administration said in a Monday statement.

    The administration said the White House estimates more than 30 million Americans would have benefited from loan forgiveness from the plans during the past three years.

    The administration is also emphasizing how its action will help Black and Latino borrowers and those who went to community college, who are more likely to struggle with student loan debt. -The Hill

    "These actions are expected to provide significant relief to Black and Latino borrowers, borrowers who attended community college, and borrowers who are financially vulnerable because they took out debt but never had the chance to complete their degree," according to the administration.

    So the Biden administration is taking taxpayer money to pay the banks their interest?

    Members of Congress who cheer for executive branch expropriation of funds should resign. https://t.co/lTqmjnPnRJ

    — Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) April 8, 2024
    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 21:20
  20. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Xi's Production Push Set To Fan Renewed Trade War

    By George Lei, Bloomberg markets live reporter and strategist

    US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen implored Beijing’s top leaders during her four-day visit to refrain from boosting the country’s already vast manufacturing capacity and to focus on lifting domestic demand instead.

    That push, however, is in stark contrast to the priorities of President Xi Jinping, whose “new productive forces” slogan is now dominating the economic policy discourse. His push suggests the country’s expansion of its production capacity will likely persist and contribute to increasing tensions with the nation’s major trading partners.

    While its not entirely clear how Xi’s policy will play out on the ground, equity investors have already picked winners since the phrase was listed as the government’s top task in early March. Market reactions seem to imply that Beijing will double down on state spending to strengthen China’s transition toward high-tech, value-added production and advanced manufacturing. There is also a perception that “Made in China 2025” - a government plan to groom 10 globally competitive industries, and one that drew the ire of former President Trump - is making a comeback.

    The push for greater investments in manufacturing will likely reinforce China’s role as the world’s factory and fuel already-tense trade relationships with the US and other major economies, both in the developed and developing worlds. Over the past few months, the European Union, for one, has pushed back hard against a glut of Chinese products flooding the bloc’s market, including EVs, semi-conductors and solar and wind equipment. Frictions have also been on the rise with countries including Chile, Turkey and India in recent years.

    Beijing has also attempted to reorient its economy toward one driven by consumption, but it’s had little success. Back in 2020, Xi advocated “dual circulation,” a catchphrase calling for a greater push on reforms to build an economy with stronger local catalysts and a pivot away from export-led growth. That vision never materialized and the term has subsequently fallen into disuse, like other popular slogans during the pandemic era such as curbing “disorderly capital.”

    3/4
    Increased investment in manufacturing, in other words, is among the few things that will allow China to reach the 5% growth target. Without that, either it needs a major fiscal boost to consumption (something Beijing decries as "welfarism"), or it has to accept lower growth.

    — Michael Pettis (@michaelxpettis) April 5, 2024

    Tasked with delivering 5% growth yet unable to either engineer a major housing stimulus or lend a strong helping hand to consumers, policymakers can only resort to increased manufacturing investments, Michael Pettis, professor of finance at Peking University and senior associate at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote in a tweet on Friday.

    With Xi’s motto “housing is for living in, not for speculation” surfacing from time to time in policy discourse and calls for direct cash transfer to consumers falling on deaf ears, re-balancing toward a consumer-driven economy looks like a tall order.

    As production exceeds consumption, Pettis says “trade conflict is only likely to get worse.” That probably won’t change no matter who wins the White House in November.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 21:00
  21. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    DOJ Stonewalls Over Audio Of Biden Interview With Special Counsel Hur

    The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reused to provide audio tapes of President Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur, defying a subpoena by the House GOP.

    In an April 8 letter to the House Oversight Committee and House Judiciary Committee, Assistant AG Carlos Felipe Uriarte complained that despite cooperating with other aspects of the Feb. 27 subpoena, "the committees have responded with escalation and threats of criminal contempt."

    "We urge the committees to avoid conflict rather than seek it," he added - while working for the same DOJ that has specifically sought conflict by launching investigations and lawsuits against former President Trump.

    "It is not too late for the committees to choose a different path, to take an offramp towards the ’spirit of dynamic compromise' that the Constitution requires of us both," the letter continues.

    The Feb. 27 subpoena requested copies of notes, audio files, video and transcripts related to Hur's probe, and had a deadline of March 7, according to the Epoch Times, which has obtained a copy.

    "Americans expect equal justice under the law and DOJ is allowing the Bidens to operate above it,"  House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said in a statement. "Special Counsel Hur’s report outlined that classified documents Joe Biden stashed for years relate to countries where his family cashed in on the Biden brand."

    In response to a request for audio of what author Mark Zwonitzer recorded while interviewing Biden, whose two memoirs he wrote, Uriarte said there is no need for the department to hand it over because the committees also have transcripts of the interviews.

    "To go further by producing the audio files would compound the likelihood that future prosecutors will be unable to secure this level of cooperation," Uriarte wrote.

    "They might have a harder time obtaining consent to an interview at all. It is clearly not in the public interest to render such cooperation with prosecutors and investigators less likely in the future."

    Uriarte then reiterated that the DOJ has provided ample evidence to the committees.

    "The department is willing to hear more from the committees, but at this time your further requests appear attenuated from the committees’ stated purposes—with today’s production, you now have the information you requested. Given the extraordinary executive branch confidentiality interests implicated here, a specific and adequate showing of need for any additional information, tethered to the authority under which the committees purport to act, is critical," he wrote.

    Uriarte then hilariously asked the committees not to make DOJ materials public, writing "To ensure an adequate opportunity to review these materials for suitability for public release, we respectfully request that the committees not disseminate or otherwise disclose the documents or information therein without prior consultation with the department."

    As the Epoch Times notes further;

    ‘The Evidence Does Not Establish’ Biden’s Guilt

    Mr. Hur announced on Feb. 8 that President Biden would not be charged.

    “Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” Mr. Hur wrote in a 388-page report to Attorney General Merrick Garland.

    The materials, the report stated, included “marked classified documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan, and notebooks containing Mr. Biden’s handwritten entries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitive intelligence sources and methods.” The FBI collected these items during a search of President Biden’s residence in Wilmington, Delaware, last year.

    The FBI last year also searched the president’s home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, where they also found classified materials.

    Nonetheless, Mr. Hur said that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” and that “prosecution of Mr. Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice’s Principles of Federal Prosecution.”

    The classified documents are from President Biden’s more than four-decade political career, including the Senate, the vice presidency, and now the presidency.

    Mr. Hur interviewed President Biden over the span of two days last year.

    In deciding not to charge the president, Mr. Hur said that a jury likely wouldn’t convict him, in part due to his cognitive issues.

    “We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” Mr. Hur wrote.

    “Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him—by then a former president well into his eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

    The Afghanistan documents, which had the highest level of classification in the United States, were from 2009. These papers were in a Virginia home that President Biden rented in 2019, where he met with Mr. Zwonitzer for his two books before the classified documents were sent to Delaware.

    “Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons,” Mr. Hur wrote.

    “Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan documents were found in Mr. Biden’s Delaware garage in 2022, his possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep classified documents in his home,” he continued.

    “The best case for charges would rely on Mr. Biden’s possession of the Afghanistan documents in his Virginia home in February 2017, when he was a private citizen and when he told his ghostwriter he had just found classified material.”

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 20:40
  22. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    New EPA Emissions Standards Defy Reality

    Authored by Christian Milord via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    The recent stringent Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) carbon emissions standards for internal combustion engines defy economic realities. The EPA would have us believe that coercing folks to buy electric vehicles (EV) will somehow reduce alleged climate change extremes. The new rules will negatively affect California and the entire nation.

    Traffic moves along Interstate 80 in Berkeley, Calif., on August 24, 2022. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

    Obviously, most folks want to maintain clean air, land, and water ecosystems. However, scientists haven’t agreed on what degree human activity adversely impacts global climate change as opposed to natural causes for extreme climate events. Several dire predictions of rising seas haven’t panned out over several decades, while cooling and warming trends haven’t been too much out of the ordinary.

    The new EPA standards are part of a government plan to make EVs two-thirds of new car sales by 2032. Thirty percent of heavy duty commercial vehicles have to be emissions-free by 2032 and 40 percent of short-haul trucks by the same time frame. Emission particulates must be reduced to nine micrograms for each cubic meter of exhaust. Spokespersons from the American Petroleum Institute stated that the new regulation “threatens consumer freedom, energy reliability and national security.”

    These EPA goals are unlikely to eventuate due to several factors. First, Americans bristle when they are pressured into purchasing products that haven’t proven their worth over an extended period of time. Electric vehicles can be expensive and heavy due to large batteries that are costly to repair when they break down. They take too long to charge up when contrasted with diesel or gas refilling times. How will the grid handle millions of EVs when it can’t even cope with current electricity demands?

    Next, electric vehicles lose power in wintry weather, thus increasing the already existent range anxiety. What if an owner needs to charge up the vehicle and the charger doesn’t work at a chosen location, or it has an incompatible charger? Moreover, owners must keep in mind that criminals cut charger cables for the materials, something they aren’t tempted to do at diesel or gasoline filling stations.

    The car rental company Hertz learned a hard lesson when it purchased a fleet of EVs and hardly anyone wanted to rent them for reasons already noted. Hertz is now trying to sell 20,000 of these vehicles and adding back gasoline-powered cars. Other car rental companies will likely see the writing on the wall and follow suit. A similar scenario is unfolding with some bus and van companies as well.

    Third, purchasing these vehicles benefits China, because the PRC controls most of the rare earth minerals that go into batteries, as well as the lithium battery industry. Products that are manufactured in China might have questionable quality control standards as they move through the production process. How reliable are these heavy batteries, and how often do they catch on fire? It is unwise to surrender critical facets of our national and technological security to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

    Fourth, mandating a rapid transition to EVs puts government policies way ahead of actual innovation in the free market. Consumers want choices when it comes to making big purchases, and if they want an EV or hybrid vehicle that’s fine, but buying an internal combustion vehicle ought to be an option, too. With decreasing options, the costs of energy will skyrocket and healthy competition will be stifled.

    Fifth, although the new EPA guidelines would further reduce carbon emissions, the earth needs these emissions because plants turn CO2 into oxygen. Furthermore, climate alarmists ignore the fact that fossil fuel emissions have become much cleaner over the last four or five decades due to catalytic converters and pollution controls on industry. Extracting and refining fossil fuels have undergone a purer process.

    Sixth, has the EPA thought about the pollution generated by the recycling of large batteries, car bodies, solar panels, and wind turbines? Fossil fuel energy will be needed to carry out this process, just as oil products keep the electric grid in operation. Solar and wind power are unreliable sources of energy and would result in brownouts and power shortages if petroleum products are left out of the energy equation.

    Seventh, do government officials and well-heeled climate “progressives” truly believe what they are preaching? Most of them have fine cars, big homes, and they jet around the world leaving a huge carbon footprint in their wake. Their hypocrisy is staggering as they attempt to impose a minimalist lifestyle on other Americans while they live the high life. They don’t have to face the repercussions of their shortsighted mandates, yet they want the masses to regress back to a pre-industrial stage of existence.

    Finally, America has plentiful supplies of natural gas and petroleum that could last more than a century. Transitioning to an emissions-free society will take several decades if it happens at all. Until then, cleaner and reliable fuel sources will be in constant demand to drive a modern economy and lift people out of poverty. Indeed, energy autonomy is a crucial aspect of economic, informational, and national security.

    Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 20:20
  23. Site: non veni pacem
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Mark Docherty

    How many of you are old enough to remember when we told the government to take this metric system and shove it? It was literally the one positive thing that happened during the Carter administration. I can tell you for certain that in the 1970s, nobody knew we already didn’t have a country anymore. More like 1913, if you really want to know. More on that later. For now, let’s enjoy a little polling. Be sure to click the link to get the dirty deets. I love the smell of fossil fuels in the morning.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/643334/ownership-ticks-fewer-nonowners-buy-one.aspx

     

  24. Site: Public Discourse
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Stephen O. Presley

    Excerpted from Cultural Sanctification: Engaging the World like the Early Church by Stephen O. Presley ©2024 (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.). Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

    It is not uncommon to hear people compare our current cultural shift toward secularism with the pagan world of the early Church. In my recent book, Cultural Sanctification: Engaging the World like the Early Church, I consider this thesis and explain how the early church engaged their pagan neighbors. In this excerpt, I describe what I call a “culturally discerning spiritual life,” which explains how ancient Christians thought through every facet of their public lives. This kind of cultural discernment requires awareness of the contingences of changing cultural circumstances and the desire to seek sanctification through them, always performing and improvising in ways that were consistent their theological and moral convictions. This was no easy task, and they quickly recognized that it required them to form deep roots through catechesis and discipleship. Like the early church, I hope that we can see the need for cultural discernment to help us navigate the complex and ever-changing social world in which we find ourselves.

    By the end of the second century, Christians were thoroughly entrenched within Roman culture and social life. To begin with, their numbers were growing at a rate quite unsettling to many of their neighbors. At least in North Africa, said Tertullian, Christians had spread out rapidly: “Though we are but of yesterday, we have filled all that is yours, cities, islands, fortified towns, classes of public attendants, the palace, the senate, the forum . . . nearly all the citizens you have in nearly all the cities are Christian.” Many Romans agreed, in dismay; they whined, “the State is filled with Christians—they are in the fields, in the citadels, in the islands: they make lamentation, as for some calamity, that both sexes, every age and condition, even high rank, are passing over to the profession of the Christian faith.”

    Given this growth, Christians and non-Christians carried on regular everyday interactions, in the marketplace and conversations at social gatherings in public places. Pagans “came in contact with the movement in a number of casual ways,” as Nock says in his classic work on conversion, because “there was little, if any, direct preaching to the masses.” The church was not distinguished from the culture by anything in their outward appearance, especially since they were not typically found among the upper crust of society and thus blended in even more with those around them. What did distinguish them was their distinctive doctrine and practice. Christianity came on the scene with “very distinctive roots” and, though fully embedded, was never fully enmeshed in the culture.

    Public skepticism toward Christianity also produced gossip and rumors as might be expected among people living in close quarters with each other. Not everyone was attracted to Christianity; there was widespread suspicion, misunderstanding, and ridicule. This led to constant tensions between the pagan and the Christian communities that played out in daily interactions. Refusing to worship pagan gods, Christians were subjected to various forms of interrogation. They were excluded from public places; ultimately, some were tortured and killed for their convictions. This hostility escalated in the times of Decius, Valerian, and Diocletian, as these emperors tried to bring unity to the fractured empire. Christian theologians often discussed how pagans charged them with all kinds of outlandish arguments. They “regard us as a human herd cut off from other people,” Tertullian said, and Minucius Felix’s pagan interlocutor suggested that Christians were a “shadowy and cunning race, silent in public, but chattering in lonely corners.”

    Obviously, Christians were making a name for themselves, and the church had to live with the negative consequences. But how did they do so? How did early Christians think through the challenges of living in a world marked by temples to idols on every street and an economic system fueled by idol worship? They had to undertake a process of resocialization, cultivating a cultural discernment in every aspect of their own spiritual lives.

    The post-conversion challenges facing Christians arose when they reentered society as baptized people and navigated the conflicts raised by their new convictions. This process demanded a culturally discerning spiritual life. In their post-conversion resocialization, those who came up out of the waters of baptism had to navigate the pagan world by a new set of convictions. They encountered their neighbors in a new perspective and had to weave new patterns of social engagement so as to live faithfully in light of their theological and moral convictions. And they had to do so in ways that made the Christian life a living testimony to the moral beauty of the gospel . . .

    The church is never reserved to one people or one political system. The early Christian apologist Aristides, for example, argued that the Christian community formed a new ethnos, a new people, distinct from Greeks, Babylonians, Egyptians, and Jews. While these groups might in varying degrees approach the truth, only Christians “have come nearer to truth and genuine knowledge than the rest of the nations.” New Testament scholar Wayne Meeks compares Aristides’s discussion of conversion to the ethnos of Christianity with the experience of immigrants who leave their native land and need to adapt to a new place and a new way of life. He defines the “resocialization” of the reenactment in a new setting of “the primary socialization that occurs normally in the interactions between child and family, the process in which the self receives those components of its structure and those basic values that are contributed by its environment.” Just as a child is reared and guided with the morals and the values of its family and then grows to maturity and enters society, so also is the Christian discipled and guided in the distinctive theological and moral assumptions of the church and matures to live Christianly in the world. This resocialization, however, is built upon different theological assumptions and maintains distinctive moral convictions so that those who convert begin following new cultural and moral patterns of the Christian life.

    In social sciences, the concept of resocialization is related to the notion of acculturation, “the changes that arise following ‘contact’ between individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds.” For ancient Christians, this became a dynamic process in which the elements of their Roman identity were filtered through their Christian morality, like separating the wheat from the chaff. Meeks says that “for the vast majority, the Christian life was an amphibian life, life at the same time in the old world that was passing away and in the new world that was coming.” Christians were “moving back and forth between the two sets of social practices” in accordance with their moral sensibilities. A key passage that helped shape this kind of movement was Matthew 6:24: “No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.” This text addressed much more than taxes; it called for a holistic framework by which the church could undertake the life of cultural discernment. The service of two masters had to be carefully regulated and deciphered, particularly in terms of forming habits, mores, and customs. The early church assumed that devotion to Christ necessitated that their process of cultural absorption be governed by their choice to follow Christ within the culture in a way that was faithful to Christian morality.

    The post-conversion challenges facing Christians arose when they reentered society as baptized people and navigated the conflicts raised by their new convictions. This process demanded a culturally discerning spiritual life.

     

    The process of Christian acculturation happened at both the personal and institutional levels. On the personal level… Christians were challenged to live moral lives among their neighbors so as to display their good works to others through social interactions. For many, this kind of witness manifested Christian virtue in all aspects of life, not least by the kinds of social interactions that Christians refused. Alongside personal interactions, acculturation also happened at the institutional level where the church viewed itself as a family, an organic body manifesting the work of God within creation. That community would be, for example, devoid of any association with paganism. As such, their gatherings, rituals, morals, and culture would be quite distinct from those of any other social or political organization. For this reason, the clergy had to remain committed to the task of organizing and leading the church, because if the “deacons, and presbyters, and bishops” turned their backs and ran, Tertullian writes, “who of the plebs will hope to persuade people.”…

    How were they to seek holiness in their world? In the early second-century text called the Didache, we can see the process of cultural discernment in action. The text describes how to welcome newcomers into the community:

    Everyone “who comes in the name of the Lord” is to be welcomed. But then examine him, and you will find out—for you will have insight—what is true and what is false. If the one who comes is merely passing through, assist him as much as you can. But he must not stay with you for more than two or, if necessary, three days. However, if he wishes to settle among you and is a craftsman, let him work for his living. But if he is not a craftsman, decide according or your own judgement how he shall live among you as a Christian, yet without being idle. But if he does not wish to cooperate in this way, then he is trading on Christ. Beware of such people.

    Sojourners among the Christian community were welcomed and supported, but that support was limited; those who wished to join the community had to take up an occupation. If not, the community had to discern how to maintain them without fostering idleness.

    We find a more detailed account of cultural discernment in Hippolytus’s tract On the Apostolic Tradition. This text tells us that anyone interested in joining the church had to go through an initial interview to ferret out potential problems in their lives or backgrounds. Newcomers were “questioned concerning the reason that they have come forward to the faith” and “questioned concerning their life and occupation, marriage status, and whether they are slave or free.” While many vocations were acceptable, any involving sexual immorality, pagan religious offices, or gladiatorial games had to be abandoned before the candidate could proceed further. Some others, such as teachers or military personnel, might continue their work with some cautioning and qualification. The same kind of sifting is also evident in Tertullian, who tied everything back to the problem of idolatry: “no profession, no trade, which administers either to equipping or forming idols, can be free from the title of idolatry.” Christians had to think carefully through every aspect of their lives, examining their vocation to see how it might influence their spirituality; as Greer argues, “theology in the early church was always directly or indirectly concerned with the common life of Christians.” The intersections of the common life were precisely where the tensions between the Christian and pagan ethical concerns became manifest.

    For contemporary Christians raised in the seeker-sensitive movement, this kind of personal interrogation of potential new members may seem a bit shocking. Early Christians did not immediately welcome just anyone into the church; the church’s identity and purity needed to be safeguarded and preserved through a slow, steady, and deliberate process. The early church played the long game and grew slowly. There were no dramatic mass conversions, only a work of church planting that attracted locals through casual contacts and everyday interactions. This was a revolution marked by “gradualism” and proved to be the “ultimate factor” that led to the rise of Christianity, says sociologist Rodney Stark. The “central doctrines of Christianity prompted and sustained attractive, liberating, and effective social relations and organizations,” steadily undermining the Roman patterns of culture. It grew naturally out of the Christians’ dual citizenship. The moral of the story is that the “Christian can be neither fully involved in his society nor fully withdrawn from it. Instead, he must keep his sights on the pilgrim’s path.”

    Image by WavebreakmediaMicro and licensed via Adobe Stock.

  25. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Ukraine May Have To Compromise With Russia, NATO Chief Admits

    In a rare moment following more than two years of war, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has belatedly admitted the Ukraine may have to compromise with Russia at the negotiating table.

    He made the remarks in a fresh interview with BBC at a moment he's urging Western allies to commit to approving his proposed five-year, 100 billion euro fund for Ukraine. As we've underscored before, this is largely about "Trump-proofing" NATO funding for Kiev for years to come, in anticipation that he could be in the White House next year.

    AFP

    Stoltenberg is still playing up the narrative that Ukraine needs major backing from the West in order to build leverage going into any potential future negotiations. Battlefield gains enabled with strong Western support could lead to an "acceptable result" for the Ukrainian side, he said.

    "At the end of the day, it has to be Ukraine that decides what kind of compromises they're willing to do, we need to enable them to be in a position where they actually achieve an acceptable result around the negotiating table," he told BBC.

    He sought to clarify that he's not urging Ukraine to offer any concessions at this point, but said that "real peace" will only be achievable when "Ukraine prevails".

    And yet, by all accounts Ukraine forces have not made any forward advances, instead the opposite. BBC commented on Stoltenberg's rare talk of 'compromise' as follows

    But his language is notable because President Volodymyr Zelensky has always been adamant that he would never negotiate with Putin despite some calls on him to do so, including from the Pope.

    Mr Stoltenberg refused to be drawn on whether he was concerned about the possible return of Donald Trump to the White House, saying only that he was sure the US would continue to be an important ally, whoever was in charge.

    Zelensky's consistent position throughout the war has been to say that he'll never negotiate with Moscow so long as Vladimir Putin is in power.

    As for Stoltenberg, he had this to say only a few weeks ago in response to Pope Francis' position that the warring sides need to urgently find compromise and end all fighting...

    In an apparent reference to Pope Francis’s remarks about Ukraine raising the white flag for the cause of peace, Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said that “surrender is not peace” for Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/mdOkSk5470

    — TVP World (@TVPWorld_com) March 11, 2024

    Last week, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stunned by asserting bluntly that "Ukraine Will Become A Member Of NATO".  He told reporters last Thursday in Brussels, where foreign ministers met to prepare for the alliance's annual meeting in July: "Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Our purpose at the summit is to help build a bridge to that membership."

    Below is one geopolitical commentator's reaction to this "lie" of Ukraine joining NATO...

    * * *

    But it’s the lying and level of lying which is astonishing. As Anthony Blinken stunned journalists just recently by saying that “Ukraine will join NATO” – perhaps the biggest lie ever of the entire war as western leaders know this is impossible and can never happen, without, that is the full defeat and exit of Russian forces. Actually it’s the second biggest lie. The greatest lie of all is the one about Russia having its sights on European countries to invade and conquer which is something that Stoltenberg constantly says but not one EU leader believes which is evident in their irresponsible depletion of their own missiles.

    Blinken says that Ukraine will be joining NATO. Under Article 5, this means that an attack on Ukraine will be considered an attack on the United States. If you want World War 3, vote Biden in November. pic.twitter.com/kv0fyv5zdf

    — David Sacks (@DavidSacks) April 4, 2024

    Macron also plays a key role in the manufacture of these untruths with his recent success in convincing journalists to write up the “we could send French troops into Ukraine” when, in fact, he packed that statement with so many caveats that he really didn’t say it at all. What is clear is that there is a state of panic now which is palpable from the West in general and that Macron, as well as NATO leaders, are having informal talks – or at least are having talks about possible talks – with Russia over some sort of what the Americans like to call an “off ramp” for Ukraine and the West. You could call it a “white flag” which has probably left you humming the song.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 20:00
  26. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    LA's District Attorney Sued By Game Of Thrones Actor Over Dismissed Pedophilia Charges

    Authored by Emma Aksalic via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón is facing legal action after a “Game of Thrones” actor filed suit over dismissed pedophilia charges.

    Actor Joseph Gatt attends the World Premiere of Disney's "Dumbo" at the El Capitan Theatre in Los Angeles, Calif., on March 11, 2019. (Jesse Grant/Getty Images for Disney)

    Joseph Gatt—best known for his role as “Thenn Warg” on the popular HBO television series—is suing the city of Los Angeles, the LAPD, and the District Attorney’s office.

    The 52-year-old is seeking $40 million in damages, and says the allegations made against him were not only career-ending, but ruined his reputation by branding him as a “serial pedophile.”

    The charges stem from a 2022 arrest after Mr. Gatt was accused of engaging in sexually explicit online communication with a minor across state lines. He notes the claims were inadequately investigated prior to his felony charges being publicly announced in an LAPD press release.

    The alleged interaction resulted from a video on Cameo Mr. Gatt recorded for a fan’s 16th birthday, before being contacted by the teenage girl via social media on multiple occasions. Mr. Gatt did respond, but according to the suit it was in a manner that was “wholly appropriate and consistent with typical celebrity-fan exchanges.” The two, however, never met in person.

    Cameo is a video-sharing website often used by public figures. Users can purchase a personalized video for the individual receiving it. This gives fans a chance to connect with their favorite celebrities with a video message for any occasion. A crucial bit of information the lawsuit says backs claims that the teenage girl was an “admittedly obsessed fan of Gatt.”

    The 16-year-old went on to claim to have pictures of the supposed inappropriate conversations, but the defendants failed to “interview or even remotely assess for credibility.” Mr. Gatt was arrested in April of 2022 following a search warrant on his home. He called the act an “invasion of privacy” that deprived him of his “liberty and freedom.”

    Court records show the charges were dismissed in February of this year, after finding there was no sustainable evidence, and following forensic analysis, the minor in question fabricated the incriminating screenshots.

    According to the suit, officials allegedly withheld exculpatory information critical to Mr. Gatt’s case and failed to take action for over 20 months following his initial arrest. The complaint notes the defendants showed “reckless disregard for the truth,” while acting with the knowledge that the pictures were not “reliable, credible, or trustworthy on their face.”

    As a result, Mr. Gatt says he was fired from two movie roles he had already been cast in, with scenes being cut or reshot from movies he previously filmed in. He was excluded or disinvited from premieres and immediately stopped receiving any future business opportunities. The actor’s PR team and representatives dropped him as a client, and said death threats had become a recurrence.

    At the time of the incident, the actor took to social media vehemently denying the claims made against him, calling them “100% categorically wrong and reckless.” He pointed out errors and misleading information in the case, but was ultimately cooperating with authorities to clear his name.

    In California, if a person is falsely accused of a crime the accuser could be held liable via civil action for malicious prosecution. As a result, Mr. Gatt is requesting “compensatory, punitive and exemplary damages in an amount to be determined at trial, constituting his losses foreseeably resulting from Defendants’ misconduct,” per the suit.

    Meanwhile, Mr. Gascón has made headlines in recent months, after one of his staff prosecutors spoke out accusing him of intimidation tactics. Deputy District Attorney Tatiana Chahoian said authorities showed up to her home to deliver a disciplinary letter after blowing the whistle on a memo from Mr. Gascón telling prosecutors not to charge for crimes regarding street racing, a major issue facing the city of Los Angeles.

    In an interview with FOX, Ms. Chahoian said she feared retaliation adding her job was on the line because she “said something my boss didn’t like.”

    Silencing people by threatening them with the police is literally a mafia tactic, and I don’t work for the mob,” Ms. Chahoian said.

    The embattled DA is up for reelection and will face off against contender and former attorney general Nathan Hochman to defend his seat come November.

    The Epoch Times reached out to Mr. Gascón’s office for comment.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 19:40
  27. Site: LifeNews
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Right to Life UK

    A baby girl from Newport has celebrated her first birthday after being born weighing just 328 grams.

    Baby Robyn was born at just 23 weeks and two days, when she was small enough to fit in the palm of a hand. She was initially placed in a sandwich bag to keep her vital organs warm, and required a ventilator to breathe. After developing sepsis, she required 16 blood transfusions.

    Now after over a year of care across two hospitals, she is now a far healthier weight of 7kg.

    “We are so proud of her”

    For Robyn’s first birthday, the staff at Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital in Cardiff made an effort to make the day special.

    “Celebrating Robyn’s first birthday was a milestone at times we thought we would never reach”, her mother Chantelle said.

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    “We were able to spend the day in a separate cubicle and enjoy some privacy while family and friends visited”, she went on. “The cubicle was decorated with banners and balloons, it looked amazing”.

    Her father Daniel added “Robyn was really spoiled with lots of lovely gifts and messages. We are so proud of her and what she’s overcome this year is truly amazing”.

    In spite of seemingly insurmountable odds, Robyn’s parents say that she is “heading in the right direction” to being allowed to return home.

    Chantelle said, “Spending a whole year in hospital has been challenging for us as parents. The last year has had many ups and downs but Robyn has made lots of progress”.

    Premature babies are increasingly surviving with improved medical intervention.

    At just over 23 weeks, baby Robyn was born before the current legal abortion limit of 24 weeks. Babies like Robyn highlight the clear contradiction at the heart of British abortion law and current medical practice.

    On the one hand, the law permits ending the lives of babies at 22 and 23 weeks, and, on the other hand, current medical practice strives to save the lives of many babies born prematurely at 22 or 23 weeks gestation.

    Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said “Congratulations to baby Robyn on reaching her first birthday after such a challenging year of medical treatment! We hope that she continues to improve and is able to return home soon”.

    “Babies like Robyn demonstrate the strength and resilience of human life, and point to the humanity of unborn and preborn children before the abortion limit of 24 weeks. Hopefully stories like Robyn’s will help to change the minds of legislators considering a reduction in the abortion limit”.

    LifeNews Note: Republished with permission from Right to Life UK.

    The post Premature Baby Girl Born at 23 Weeks Celebrates Her 1st Birthday appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  28. Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: noreply@blogger.com (Mary Ann Kreitzer)
  29. Site: RT - News
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    Kiev is “desperate” for American funding, Chuck Schumer has warned

    Ukraine is failing on the battlefield because of a lack of American funding, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Monday. He demanded the House Republicans pass the $61 billion aid bill as soon as possible.

    Schumer, a New York Democrat, brought up Ukraine in a speech about the upcoming US legislative agenda. The Democrat-majority Senate passed the funding proposal in mid-February, but the Republican-majority House has not voted on it yet.

    “The situation in Ukraine is desperate,” Schumer said, claiming that the funding bill has been “collecting dust” for 55 days while “our friends in Ukraine fight and die on the battlefield with no support.” With each passing day, Ukraine is running out of more soldiers, ammunition and hope, he added.

    “Let’s be blunt: the biggest reason Ukraine is losing the war is because the hard-right in the Congress has paralyzed the US from acting. That’s it, that’s the reason,” Schumer said.

    Read more A Belgian F-16 jet fighter takes part in the NATO Air Nuclear drill "Steadfast Noon" at the Kleine-Brogel air base in Belgium on October 18, 2022. Washington’s NATO promise to Kiev is prelude to ‘nuclear apocalypse’ – Musk

    By passing the bill, House Speaker Mike Johnson would “do the right thing for Ukraine, for America, and for democracy,” the New York Democrat argued. Otherwise, he claimed, the Republicans would hand a “large victory” to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    Schumer made much the same argument while visiting Ukraine in late February, claiming that if Kiev gets the money, “they will win the war and beat Russia.”

    Democrats have sought to split the GOP into “moderates” and “MAGA Republicans” – referring to former US President Donald Trump’s campaign slogan ‘Make America Great Again’ – to get support for their legislative agenda in both chambers of Congress. The tactic has paid off in the Senate, where 22 Republicans voted in favor of funding Ukraine, more than offsetting three Democrats who were opposed.

    Read more  French President Emmanuel Macron Macron believes Ukraine could fall soon – Politico

    Republicans currently have a razor-thin majority in the 435-member House, with 218 seats to the Democrats’ 213. Johnson became speaker in late October, after a group of disgruntled GOP lawmakers voted to oust his predecessor Kevin McCarthy for striking a secret deal with the Democrats to pass Ukraine funding.

    The US has provided Ukraine with $113 billion in various forms of assistance since the start of hostilities. Meanwhile, Russia has repeatedly condemned Western arms shipments to Ukraine, saying these will only prolong the conflict, while making the West a direct participant in the hostilities.

  30. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Taiwanese Chip-Making Giant TSMC Gets Billions In US Grants, Loans For Third Arizona Chip Factory 

    Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world's largest contract chip maker, plans to build a third chip factory in Arizona after receiving $6.6 billion in grants and $5 billion in loans through US government subsidies. This is part of a massive effort led by the Biden administration to make America's semiconductor manufacturing industry great again. 

    "Today, we continue building on that historic progress, with the Department of Commerce announcing a preliminary agreement with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) to support the construction of leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing facilities right here in the United States," the White House wrote in a press release

    The White House said, "Thanks to this investment, TSMC will also build a third chip factory in Phoenix, increasing its total investment in Arizona to $65 billion and creating over 25,000 direct construction and manufacturing jobs, along with thousands of indirect jobs."

    "It's a national security problem that we don't manufacture any of the world's most sophisticated chips in the United States," US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told reporters. 

    TSMC's third chip plant will produce next-generation 2-nanometer chips, forecasted to be in production by the decade's end. According to Bloomberg, the other two chip plants are expected to begin production in 2025 and 2028. 

    Raimondo pointed out that 2nm chips will be crucial for artificial intelligence chips that power the defense industry. 

    "For the first time ever, we will be making at scale the most advanced semiconductor chips on the planet here in the United States of America, by the way, with American workers," the official said. 

    TSMC's expansion in the United States will mitigate China's influence on chip supply chains across Asia, especially Taiwan-based ones. 

    Here are some of the latest investments the Biden administration has dished out to tech firms for re-shoring efforts. 

    Source: Bloomberg

    Raimondo recently said the Chips Act allows the US to capture about 20% of the world's most advanced chip production by 2030. As a reminder, the US once had 37% of the world's chip production in 1990 and has since plummeted to about 12% in recent years due to the West's globalist leaders who off-shored America's manufacturing capacity. It's time to bring the production back as the world fractures into a dangerous multi-polar state. 

     

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 19:20
  31. Site: RT - News
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    Ottawa must bolster its military capabilities in the Arctic, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says

    Canada unveiled an updated defense policy document on Monday, envisioning a massive spending program for the coming years. Ottawa plans to invest nearly $6 billion over the next five years, and more than $53 billion over the next two decades.

    While the program still falls behind the 2% of GDP defense spending goal, met by less than half of NATO member states, the Canadian government touted it as a “significant step” towards fulfilling the commitment.

    The document unveiled by Ottawa, titled ‘Our North, Strong and Free,’ signals that the country is seeking to take a stronger posture in the Arctic, with the construction of new military facilities in the north, as well as bolstering maritime and aerial capabilities.

    “We will explore options for renewing and expanding our submarine fleet to enable the Royal Canadian Navy to project a persistent deterrent on all three coasts, with under-ice capable, conventionally powered submarines,” the document reads.

    Read more British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (R) speaks alongside US President Joe Biden during an AUKUS summit in San Diego, California, March 13, 2023 US and UK rushing to expand ‘Asian NATO’ – Politico

    During a press conference to present the new defense policy, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau suggested the country could also consider procuring nuclear submarines.

    “That is certainly what we will be looking at, what type of submarines are appropriate for Canada’s responsibilities in protecting the longest coastline in the world and the longest Arctic coastline in the world,” he said while responding to a question about the option to get non-conventional vessels.

    The prime minister also praised growing cooperation with the US-led AUKUS bloc, welcoming the prospects of Japan joining it. The military partnership, established in late 2021, involves the US and the UK assisting Australia in procuring a nuclear submarine fleet.

    READ MORE: UK commits nearly $1bn to nuclear program

    “We have had excellent conversations with both the US, the UK and Australia as to how we can work even closer. It’s good news that both Canada and New Zealand are going to be joined by Japan and that is engaging more closely in AUKUS conversations,” Trudeau stated.

  32. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    New York Grand Jury Releases Scathing Report Against Child Protection Services Agency

    Authored by Alice Giordano via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    The result of a six-month special grand jury investigation into the murder of 8-year-old Tommy Valva by his father has revealed another disturbing instance of abuse of power by child protection agencies and the family court system.

    A picture of Harmony Montgomery before she went missing in 2019 (Courtesy of Justice For Harmony)

    The New York boy died in 2019 from hypothermia after his father, an NYPD cop, inflicted a series of cruel punishments on him. He made the child strip naked, lay on a cold cement garage floor, and hosed him down with cold water. Michael Valva was convicted of his son’s murder in 2022.

    The grand jury report, released on April 3, is wrought with similar findings in the recent review of the murder of 5-year-old Harmony Montgomery. Details of the girl’s murder and the state of New Hampshire’s inability to account for her whereabouts for two years gripped the nation.

    It was a tragedy set in motion when Massachusetts Family Court Judge Mark Newman awarded custody of the little girl to her father Adam Montgomery. Mr. Montgomery was convicted in February of murdering his daughter.

    Judge Newman granted custody to Mr. Montgomery instead of the girl’s mother despite his lengthy violent criminal history and transient status.

    Before Tommy Valva’s murder, Suffolk County Family Court Judge Jeff Zimmerman also awarded full custody of the little boy along with his two brothers to his father Michael Valva over the boy’s mother Justyna Zubko-Valva.

    In both Harmony and Tommy’s cases, court records, which were widely publicized in both murder trials, show that neither of their mothers had any history of abuse or violence.

    In both of the children’s cases, child protection service workers went along with the court’s custody awards despite knowing that there were serious child abuse allegations and child welfare concerns pending against both men.

    In her office’s findings from an investigation into Harmony’s murder, Maria Mossaides, director of the Massachusetts Office of the Child Advocate, slammed the state child protection agency for what she called system-wide failures and also for “recklessly” favoring parental rights over Harmony’s safety.

    Throughout its 75-page investigative report, the New York grand jury charges New York’s child protection services system with the same kind of failures.

    It faulted CPS employees for deeming child abuse allegations by another parent as unfounded with little evidence. It also cited the system as flawed for not having any independent checks and balances with the agency over such decisions.

    According to the grand jury, the agency even refused to return its records for the investigation.

    The failure of CPS to do so can only be interpreted as a transparent attempt to shield their own inaction from public scrutiny. Thus, the laws and rules must be changed to prevent such future injustices,” the investigative jury charged.

    In its report, it also focuses on another familiar issue raised in other states regarding the operations of child protection agencies and the family court system: the immunity that child protection workers and judges enjoy from dereliction of duty.

    Rep. Bryan Slaton presents Amendment 1 to House Bill 567, on April 1, 2021. (Screenshot courtesy of Bryan Slaton)

    “Even though immunity does not preclude a finding of criminal liability for CPS caseworkers who have engaged in willful misconduct or gross negligence, such caseworkers are still effectively impervious to any such liability in cases where reports are deemed unfounded,” the panel wrote.

    The panel discovered that caseworkers, due to not being required to substantiate their findings to the court or even a supervisor, created a shield against accusations of “willful misconduct or gross negligence.”

    “In this regard, employees of CPS have the unilateral ability to thwart criminal investigations prior to the matter of immunity even becoming relevant, by determining that a case is unfounded, or by deciding not to migrate prior unfounded reports and related materials in a new indicated investigation,” the panel found.

    At a press conference during the murder trial, Ms. Zubko-Valva talked about her many pleas for help to child protection workers and other state officials that went ignored.

    “I kept thinking about all the institutions who failed to help him, who completely did absolutely nothing ... now everybody’s trying to do the right thing ... but where were you when I begged you for help when you could have saved my child’s life,” said Ms. Zubka-Valva who said she also filed a complaint with the FBI after Judge Hope Schwartz Zimmerman gave custody to Mr. Valva.

    The judge awarded custody to the father after a divorce attorney complained to the court Ms. Zubko-Valva was “interfering with her access to the children,” according to a pending wrongful death lawsuit Ms. Zubko-Valva filed against the county CPS.

    Details of CPS' alleged complicity in the court’s custody ruling are scattered throughout the lawsuit. These include accounts of the agency’s quick dismissal of a flash drive. The lawsuit stated the mother provided this drive to the agency, and it contained 320 documents and other evidence supporting the claim that Tommy and his brothers were enduring severe abuse by their father and stepmother, Angela Pollina, who was convicted last March of the second-degree murder of her stepson.

    According to the lawsuit, the evidence included several letters from Tommy’s pediatrician and therapists corroborating the abuse. It was already revealed in the lawsuit and during Mr. Valva and Ms. Pollina’s trial that the agency ignored visible signs Tommy and his brothers were being starved.

    Two years ago, the Institute for Justice (IJ) launched “Project Immunity and Accountability,” a national campaign to end immunity for government officials.

    If we the people must follow the law, our government must follow the Constitution,” the group states as the headline to its campaign’s mission.

    CPS agencies have long been accused of using immunity to justify their troubling decisions rather than reform them.

    In a 2007 case, a child advocate brought a federal suit against the Standing Rock Child Protection Services and Bureau of Indian Affairs in North Dakota after the agencies claimed immunity for knowingly placing a juvenile sex offender into a foster home with three young children.

    “Such immunity, it maintains, is based on the agency’s policy decision to protect the privacy interests of its former ward,” the lawsuit charged. “By this argument, CPS creates a smokescreen within which to hide from liability, despite its flagrant abuse of a system that it is duty-bound to protect.”

    As part of its campaign, IJ is asking state legislators to adopt amendments to their state constitution to abolish government immunity, but so far no lawmakers have taken up the cause.

    In New Hampshire, where Harmony Montgomery was murdered in 2019, Republican lawmakers like Rep. Leah Cushman have been pushing for reform of the child protection agency and family courts.

    The state did not accept any blame for the girl’s murder even though evidence was introduced during her father’s trial that the agency failed to conduct mandatory checks on her and appeared to be unaware that she had been missing for two years.

    Recently, Ms. Cushman successfully convinced House leaders to form a special committee to investigate the New Hampshire Division of Children, Youth, and Family (DCYF).

    As reported previously by The Epoch Times, the committee had only started when she was removed as chairman of the committee by the House Speaker when she initiated a voluntary oath for both victims and officials as part of the special committee’s investigation.

    She has since told The Epoch Times she believes the “real fix” is to take child protection service agencies out of the “investigation business,” abolish family courts, and return allegations of child abuse to the criminal courts where there is real due process.

    “Keeping these cases civil is being soft on crime and letting people shown to be abusive to never face justice in a real court of law,” she said.

    The NH DCYF, Massachusetts Department of Children Services, and Suffolk County Child Protective Services did not respond to requests for comment from The Epoch Times.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 19:00
  33. Site: Henrymakow.com
    3 weeks 5 days ago


    bro-world-dom.jpeg
    Brother Nathaniel identifies the three pincers 
    of ZOG (Zionist Occupational Government) 

    Put the stages together:
    Control Of Money,
    Control of Politicians,
    Control Of The Church,
    and you got a recipe for World Domination.




    by Brother Nathaniel
    (henrymakow.com)

    "It fits what's happening today," said Henry Ford Sr.

    He was talking about "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion."

    And he saw it unfolding before his very eyes.

    As Jewish kids we were forbidden to read it.

    But kids find ways to break what's forbidden just to find out why.

    The book with so many layers of intrigue was too much for me as a kid.

    640px-19200522_Dearborn_Independent-Intl_Jew.jpg
    (Ford published five volumes which exposed every aspect of Jewish oppression)

    But today, like Henry Ford, "it fits."

    What crystalizes in my mind about the Protocols, are the stages of world domination that World Jewry is pursuing.

    Stage 1

    Control Of Money

    Private Jewish banks in Germany, France, England, Sweden, Switzerland, and last, America with the Federal Reserve--The FED--have set up Central Banks which counterfeit money...legally.

    They're answerable to no one. 

    Clip: "What is the proper relationship, what should be the proper relationship between the chairman of the Fed and the President of the United States?" 

    "Well, first of all the Federal Reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take."]

    Stage 2

    Control Of Politicians

    This stage has a double module, 'media' and 'campaign coffer.'

    For example. Illinois Senator Charles Percy, former head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee refused to sign AIPAC's, "Letter of 76."

    Protesting its "reassessment" of Middle East policy which favored Israel over the Palestinians, the Jews got to work to get rid of Percy.

    The Jewish owned press did a smear campaign of Percy and propped up the unknown Paul Simon.

    Simon enjoyed wonderful press, found his campaign coffers filled to the brim by AIPAC and its billionaire sponsors.

    Percy's honorable career bit the dust.

    Stage 3

    Destruction Of The Church

    This is a three-pronged attack.

    First attack the mores of The Church by subverting honorable marriage and instead promote sexual perversion.

    rachel.jpeg
    Rachel Levine is the visual meme, the Jewish power gleans.

    That it's okay to distort one's sexual identity and physical attributes.

    Second, attack the youth through the schools, especially to hate their race, the White Race, which historically has opposed Jewish dominance.

    Third, infiltrate The Church with evangelical Israel lovers--an anti-Christ state--and with partisans of homosexuality.

    Pull the stages together:

    Control Of Money,
    Control of Politicians,
    Control Of The Church,
    and you got a recipe for World Domination.

    The demographics are there.

    World Jewry runs a tight trading, economic, religious, jurisprudence, and academic network globally.

    It's not too late to put the brakes on Jewish World Domination.

    I think the noticing has already begun.
  34. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    China Gold-Buying Frenzy Sparks Chaos In ETFs

    For the second time in a week, trading in an ETF that owns gold companies was halted in China overnight.

    The ETF’s price had gained over 40% in the past four sessions before falling 10% after trading resumed Monday.

    “The lack of alternatives, and the fact that it’s become a lot more difficult than it was a few years ago to get your money out of China and invest elsewhere - I think that’s definitely helping gold,” said Nikos Kavalis, managing director at consultancy Metals Focus Ltd.

    “Demand is pretty decent, considering where the price is.”

    China Asset Management Co. - who run the ChinaAMC CSI SH-SZ-HK Gold Industry Equity ETF - halted the investment vehicle "to protect investors' interests" as the fund’s premium over its underlying assets increased to more than 30%...

    As Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas highlighted: "Investors [in China] are so desperate to buy things that are not linked to their own economy/stock mkt, which has been in the gutter."

    For context, that surge in the ETF correlated with a spot gold price near $2700...

    Source: Bloomberg

    As Bloomberg reports, the enthusiasm about products tied to gold, which has staged a record-setting rally in recent weeks, shows a desire to park money in a sector seen relatively immune to a struggling economy.

    “Gold is trading at an all time high and gold ETF demand has surged in the past week with almost $600 million of net inflows into gold ETFs globally,” said Rebecca Sin, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst.

    “Demand in Mainland China could continue as investors look to diversify their holdings with commodities and foreign ETFs.”

    The ETF fervor is a fresh example of yield-hungry Chinese investors flocking to pockets of market strength as deepening property woes, volatile stocks and falling deposit rates reduce their options.

    For those wondering why buying bitcoin ETFs is not allowed there, Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas notes that "if it were, they’d be going gaga for them given how much FOMO they have been showing for gold and US stocks (btc easily outperforming both)."

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 18:40
  35. Site: LifeNews
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Steven Ertelt

    Virginia Society for Human Life (VSHL) applauds Pro-life Governor Youngkin for vetoing two bills that allowed abortionists and other abortion business providers to evade valid laws in other states. The effect of these bills would have been to place Virginia in a position of ignoring the right of other states to hold reckless abortionists accountable for the crimes they may have committed in other states that have passed protective pro-life laws. It would have placed abortionists in a unique class that is not afforded to any other medical professionals in Virginia.

    Gov. Youngkin correctly pointed out in his statement that these bills would place in jeopardy the long-standing relationship that Virginia has with other states regarding respecting the laws of other states.

    “The extradition process among the states has a long and successful history within an established legal framework required by the U.S. Constitution,” Gov. Youngkin wrote. “This bill would undermine that framework and disrupt the extradition laws in all fifty states. Our cooperative extradition system could collapse if individual states were to carve out crimes for which they would not recognize codified laws because of differing political positions.”

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    VSHL is also very aware that Virginia is being used as a destination state for abortions and that a law like this would have given cover to those bad actors who are willing to break laws in other states. In doing so these individuals are putting women’s lives at risk as well as killing their preborn children.

    “Women in other states who may have been injured by abortion practitioners willing to break the laws of other places need to be sure that Virginia will not provide a hiding place for these rogue abortionists,” said Olivia Gans Turner, president of VSHL. “Thank you, Gov. Youngkin for rejecting this dangerous bill.”

    The post Virginia Governor Youngkin Vetoes Two Pro-Abortion Bills appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  36. Site: RT - News
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    A decade since the 2% of GDP goal was set, a third of the bloc isn’t there yet

    Twelve NATO countries are yet to meet the pledge to spend 2% of their GDP on defense, the American ambassador to the alliance, Julianne Smith, said on Monday.

    The US-led bloc set the two-percent goal in 2014, after the Western-backed coup in Kiev touched off the Donbass conflict. All members were supposed to make the “burden-sharing” benchmark within a decade.

    “Right now we have 20 allies that are meeting the 2% pledge – 20 allies,” Smith said in a speech at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. “That is a significant increase over a decade. Of course we want it to be all 32 and we’re going to keep pushing until we get there.”

    Smith was the keynote speaker at the ‘NATO at 75: Charting a New Course?’ conference, organized by Georgetown’s Center for Security Studies. The event also featured an appearance by Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) General Christopher Cavoli.

    Read more NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg speaks during a press conference at the NATO Headquarters in Brussels on April 4, 2024. Ukraine may have to compromise with Russia – Stoltenberg

    It was unclear which data Smith was relying on to make her claim. As of February this year, estimates of 2023 military spending still showed that only 11 member states had met the 2% goal while 18 were still falling short – including France, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Italy, Canada, Türkiye and Spain. Iceland does not have an actual military while Finland and Sweden – which joined last April and last month, respectively – were not included in the estimates.

    Poland last year spent 3.9% of its gross domestic product on the military, the highest of all bloc members. Polish President Andrzej Duda recently proposed raising the minimum spending threshold to 3%, arguing that 2% was “no longer enough.”

    The US came in second at 3.49% of its GDP. However, in terms of raw numbers its military budget was more than double of all other bloc members combined, at $860 billion.

    Speaking on the campaign trail last month, former US President Donald Trump suggested that Washington should only live up to its treaty commitments to NATO members that “play fair” and recalled telling one bloc member that he would encourage Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to countries that were “delinquent.”

    Read more  NATO Summit on July 11, 2023 in Vilnius, Lithuania. Fyodor Lukyanov: NATO looks strong, but the real picture is very different

    In her speech at Georgetown, Smith argued that NATO has been successful at “burden-sharing” in the case of Ukraine. While the US has provided around $75 billion in military aid to Kiev, the European members of the bloc contributed around $110 billion, she noted.

    The US envoy also argued that the past two years have been “transformative,” noting NATO’s reorientation from expeditionary wars to opposing Russia in Europe. At the same time, she pointed out that the bloc has updated its security strategy to view China as a potential threat and reach out to “partners in the Indo-Pacific” to counter it.

  37. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Russia Is Preparing For A Gasoline Shortage

    By Tsvetana Paraskova of OilPrice.com

    Russia is seeking to import gasoline from Kazakhstan in case shortages occur on the Russian market because of the diminished refining capacity due to maintenance and damages from Ukrainian drone attacks, Reuters reported on Monday, citing industry sources.

    Russia has asked Kazakhstan to prepare to potentially deliver 100,000 tons of gasoline, the sources told Reuters.

    Russia is also ready to import gasoline from Belarus if the current domestic supply is insufficient to meet demand.

    Russia is estimated to have slashed in half its gasoline exports via railway after imposing a six-month ban on exports from March 1 to ensure sufficient domestic supply in peak demand season, while several refineries are undergoing regular maintenance and urgent repairs after Ukrainian drone strikes.

    Russia suspended gasoline exports from March 1 until August 31, 2024, to ensure supply for the domestic market in peak demand season, in a second such export ban in just a few months. In the autumn of 2023, Russia banned exports of diesel and gasoline in an effort to stabilize domestic fuel prices in the face of soaring prices and shortages as crude oil rallied and the Russian ruble weakened.

    Russia has seen its refining capacity diminished in recent weeks, due to seasonal maintenance, but most of all due to drone attacks from Ukraine, which have damaged several refineries that have shut down for repairs.

    According to Reuters estimates, the amount of Russian oil refining capacity that has been taken offline due to Ukrainian drone strikes is 14% of Russia’s total refining capacity. Calculations show that 900,000 barrels per day of refining capacity have been taken offline by drone strikes, Reuters reported last month.

    Most recently, strong spring floods have shut down one refinery in Russia as they compromised a dam in the area forcing the evacuation of thousands of people.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 18:20
  38. Site: LifeNews
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Steven Ertelt

    On March 26, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. At the heart of the discussion before the justices were (a) whether the Alliance had legal standing to file the lawsuit; and (b) the decisions in 2016 and 2021 made by the FDA that greatly weakened regulations of the abortion drug mifepristone.

    Not that it was anything new, but the legacy media immediately promoted talking points that seemed to come directly from the PR departments of pro-abortion groups.

    Language is important to how people perceive an issue and with some of the most widely-read news outlets using pro-abortion language, they do a disservice to readers

    Ultimately, pro-abortion groups claim that any legislation or court rulings protecting preborn babies are “bans.” This is the tone many mainstream media organizations have taken in describing the case before the High Court including USA Today’s Maureen Groppe.

    Groppe wrote in an article titled, “Abortion pill challenge gives Supreme Court chance to move toward national abortion ban,”

    Two years after the Supreme Courterased the constitutional right to an abortion, creating a patchwork of access across the country, the justices could now pave the way toward a national ban. [underlining added]

    Note the language in the first sentence. It’s not neutral language—it’s loaded with jargon from pro-abortion groups.

    Please follow LifeNews.com on Gab for the latest pro-life news and info, free from social media censorship.

    In a Washington Post analysis “Why the Supreme Court abortion pill case is so fraught for the right,” Aaron Blake wrote,

    We don’t yet know what the Supreme Court will do. But over and over again, we’ve seen how putting these decisions in the hands of legislators or judges can have significant and troublesome consequences for the GOP. [underlining added]

    The assumption, once again, is that protecting preborn babies is something only a minority of Americans want and that any laws or court decisions that provide protections are completed in an echo chamber with no support from the public. This wording undermines the ideas behind the Dobbs decision.

    In The New York Times, Lisa Lerer wrote in “On the issue of abortion, Democrats see a political winner. Republicans see more of a puzzle,”

    They [‘conservative politicians and judges in deep red states’] have moved to completely criminalize the procedure and restrict access to other aspects of women’s reproductive health, including fertility treatments.

    Democrats hope that arguments at the Supreme Court over access to abortion pills will provide another moment for the party to highlight the most extreme elements of the anti-abortion movement. [underlining added]

    Once again, protecting innocent human life is seen as extreme.

    Mark Sherman of The Associated Press (AP) wrote,

    The practical consequences of a ruling foabortion opponents would be dramatic, including possibly halting the delivery of mifepristone through the mail and at large pharmacy chains, andending increasingly popular telehealthvisits at which the drug can be prescribed. [underlining added]

    Note how Sherman used words like “dramatic,” “halting” and “increasing popular” in its description of a ruling that restored safety protocols for mifepristone abortions.

    Even using “a ruling for abortion opponents” sets up the statement to infer that abortion is the normal state of things and that being pro-life is “opposing” the norm.

    Biased coverage of this issue has serious, life-changing repercussions not only for women’s health and safety but also for their preborn babies. It is our job to straighten out the crooked language of the legacy media.

    The post Liberal Media is Wrong, There’s No Right to Kill Babies in Abortions appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  39. Site: LifeNews
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Gary Bauer

    Former President Donald Trump issued a statement this morning on his Truth Social platform outlining his position on abortion.

    The statement was necessary because the Biden campaign believes they can defeat Trump, take back the House and hold the Senate if they can convince the public that Trump would outlaw all abortions. No matter what he said, it was guaranteed that someone would be disappointed.

    Trump made it clear that he is pro-life, with exceptions for rape, incest, and to save the life of the mother. That is the same position Ronald Reagan held.

    Trump said he is proud that Roe v. Wade was overturned, and he thanked the justices by name, three of whom he appointed, who made the historic Dobbs decision possible. That decision ended the lie that the “right to abortion” was in the Constitution.

    Now that the pro-life movement has finally achieved that tremendous victory, Donald Trump said the issue belongs to the voters in their respective states. He said different states will do different things, but, ultimately, “This is all about the will of the people.”

    Please follow LifeNews.com on Gab for the latest pro-life news and info, free from social media censorship.

    Trump also attacked the left for its extreme pro-abortion position, which is abortion up to the moment of birth with no limits whatsoever.

    Many progressives are pushing radical legislation that would repeal every pro-life state law and make abortion-on-demand the law of the land in every state. That is not the position of the American people. Two-thirds of Americans support limits on abortion.

    Our Position

    American Values would have preferred that former President Trump had endorsed a ban at the federal level. Such a federal law would restrict abortions at the earliest point in the pregnancy that we could get majority support for. Even better would be a future Supreme Court decision that found a right to life in our Constitution.

    Unfortunately, the reality we are facing is that Joe Biden and the pro-abortion movement are using their massive war chests to convince the American people that we don’t want to allow any abortions for any reason at any point in pregnancy.

    Trump understands we have to show that they, not us, are the extremists who won’t stop any abortion for any reason in any month of pregnancy.

    Plus, none of us should forget that without Donald Trump’s three outstanding Supreme Court appointments, Roe v. Wade would still be the law of the land, and another generation of Americans would be taught that destroying your unborn child is a constitutional right, like the freedom of religion and the freedom of speech.

    We owe President Trump a lot.

    I join Marjorie Dannenfelser of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America and Penny Nance of Concerned Women for America, who have reiterated their support for President Trump.

    LifeNews.com Note: Gary Bauer is the president of American Values, a national pro-family organization and is the former president of the Family Research Council. Bauer ran for the Republican nomination for president and appears frequently on radio and television programs.

    The post Trump is Right: Biden is the Extremist Because He Supports Unlimited Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  40. Site: Real Jew News
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Brother Nathanael

    The Three Stages Of World Domination
    April 8 2024

    ___________________________________
    More Vids!
    +BN Vids Archive! HERE!
    ___________________________________
    Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
    Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

    Secure Donation Form

    Or Send Your Contribution To:
    The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
    E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com
    Scroll Down For Comments

  41. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Washington Offers Tehran Negotiations To Avoid Striking Israel: Report

    Via The Cradle

    Iranian diplomatic sources say the US is trying to convince Iran not to retaliate against Israel for its bombing of the Iranian embassy in Syria earlier this month, Al-Jarida newspaper reported on Monday.

    The Israeli strike targeted a building attached to the Iranian embassy in Damascus. It led to the killing of the commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Zahedi, his deputy, and five other IRGC officers. A source in the Iranian foreign ministry told the prominent Kuwaiti daily newspaper Al-Jarida that Washington offered Tehran direct negotiations with Tel Aviv to de-escalate the conflict.  

    According to the source, Washington will guarantee to persuade Tel Aviv to stop its military operations in Syria and Lebanon on the condition that Iran commit not to retaliate against Israel for the Damascus attack.

    At the same time, a diplomatic source in Beirut told Al-Jarida that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected an American proposal to pledge to stop attacks in Syria.

    The source added that Iranian leader Ali Khamenei is reviewing the US offer but is not expected to accept it if it does not include guarantees for a comprehensive ceasefire in Gaza and to stop all Israeli and US attacks on Iranian targets or those belonging to Iran's allies in the Axis of Resistance.

    The source revealed that the Iranians had also previously received a verbal Israeli proposal via a Gulf state. In the proposal, Tel Aviv claimed it was ready to stop operations against Iranian targets in Syria and Lebanon in exchange for Tehran abandoning retaliation for the killing of Zahedi, whose killing was considered the most significant blow to Iran since the assassination of Qassem Soleimani.

    According to the source, the Iranian Foreign Ministry responded to the Israeli message by saying that the proposal must also include a ceasefire in Gaza.

    However, some IRGC leaders were unhappy with the foreign ministry's response, viewing the Israeli proposal as a trap. The IRGC leaders argued that any negotiations with Israel must take place only after Iran has retaliated.

    The source stated that IRGC commanders believe that Israel's targeting of the Iranian consulate is an opportunity that should not be missed to strike a strong blow at Israel, especially since the consular building in Damascus is considered sovereign Iranian territory and was targeted in a clear violation of international law.

    The source said that the IRGC leadership believes Washington will not enter a war with Iran even if it retaliates against Israel. They also consider that an adequately harsh strike against Israel will compel it to accept a ceasefire in Gaza and abandon any plans to invade Lebanon or escalate its bombing in Syria.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 17:40
  42. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Biden May Not Appear On Ohio Ballot Due To Democratic Convention Timing

    President Biden is in danger of not appearing on Ohio's general election ballot, thanks to the fact that the Democrats' nominating convention is scheduled to take place after the state's candidate certification deadline. 

    The chief legal counsel for Ohio secretary of state Frank La Rose broke that news to Ohio Democratic Party Chairwoman Liz Walters via a letter, the Washington Post reports. He noted that Ohio law sets the presidential candidate certification deadline at 90 days before the election -- which this year means Aug. 7. Trouble is, the Democratic national convention in Chicago doesn't start until Aug. 19. 

    The state of the race per 270toWin's interactive map

    The letter offered two varyingly implausible avenues by which Dems could fix the snag: 

    • Reschedule the national convention so Biden can be nominated before Aug. 7
    • Persuade the Republican-controlled Ohio legislature to enact an exception to the law out of the kindness of their hearts, and coax Republican Gov. Mike DeWine to sign it

    In 2020, both party conventions were similarly scheduled after the Ohio deadline. Legislators did pass a one-time exception then, but they were incentivized to do so because the GOP also needed relief. This time, it's only the Democrats swinging in the breeze.  

    Right on cue, a University of Cincinnati political science professor told the Post that if Biden doesn't appear on the ballot, it would sap confidence in American governance. “If this were to actually occur and President Biden were held off the ballot, it would be devastating to the general sort of faith in democracy,” said David Niven. 

    Biden's absence could hurt incumbent Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, who's in a tight race with GOP challenger Bernie Moreno

    Given their attempts to block Trump from ballots on flimsy 14th Amendment "insurrectionist" claims, Democrats are in no position to ask for mercy. Republicans aren't the only ones who'd like to tell the Democrats "tough luck." After all, while constantly crowing about saving Our Democracy®, the Dems are engaging in aggressive lawfare to make sure Americans don't have the option to vote for independent and third-party candidates. 

    Donald Trump won Ohio in 2016 and 2020 -- beating both Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden by 8 percentage points -- and he's up by 10 in the RealClearPolitics Ohio polling average. Given that, Biden's absence from the ballot may be something of a moot point in the race for Ohio's 17 electoral votes, but could sap already-sagging leftist enthusiasm about the election, which could impact down-ballot Democrats.   

    One of those trying to ride Sleepy Joe's musty, mothball-scented coattails is incumbent Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown, who's in a competitive race with Republican challenger Bernie Moreno. In a poll taken before Moreno won the primary, Brown led the Trump-endorsed Moreno by 4 points. 

    Whistling past the Ohio election graveyard, a Biden-Harris 2024 spokesman told the Post, “We’re monitoring the situation in Ohio and we’re confident that Joe Biden will be on the ballot in all 50 states.”

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 17:20
  43. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Democrats Cry Foul As Anti-Free Speech Allies Turn Against Them

    Authored by Jonathan Turley,

    Below is my column in The Hill on the recent disruptions of events featuring leading Democrats from President Joe Biden to Rep. Jamie Raskin. After years of supporting the censoring and blacklisting of others, these politicians are now being targeted by the very anti-free speech movement that they once fostered. Hillary Clinton last week became the latest Democrat targeted by protesters in a visit to her alma mater, Wellesley College.

    Here is the column:

    You are “killing people,” President Biden told social media companies a couple of years ago. He sought to shame executives into censoring more Americans. Biden has lashed out at disinformation by anti-vaxxers, “election deniers” and others. This month, those words were thrown back at Biden himself as a “genocide denier” by protesters who have labeled him “Genocide Joe” over his support for Israel.

    After years of supporting censorship and blacklisting of people with opposing views, politicians and academics are finding themselves the subjects of the very anti-free speech tactics that they helped foster.

    Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), for example, has been a leading figure in Congress opposing efforts to curtail massive censorship programs coordinated by the Biden administration. While opposing the investigation into past federal censorship efforts, Raskin continues to push social media companies to increase the censorship and silencing of Americans. Last December, Raskin sent a letter on behalf of other Democrats on the powerful House Oversight Committee demanding even more censorship, not only on election fraud, COVID or climate change, but also on abortion.

    “We are troubled by the rapid spread of abortion misinformation and disinformation on your company’s social media platform,” he wrote, “and the threat this development poses to safe abortion access in the United States.”

    When journalists and even other members testified in favor of free speech, Democrats attacked them as “Putin lovers” and fellow travelers supporting “insurrectionists.”

    Last week, however, the left turned on Raskin.

    He was giving a lecture titled “Democracy, Autocracy and the Threat to Reason in the 21st Century.” According to the Maryland Reporter, the protesters accused Raskin of being “complicit in genocide.” After efforts to resume his remarks, University of Maryland President Darryll Pines finally ended the event early.

    Pines then pulled a Raskin. While mildly criticizing the students for their lack of “civility,” he defended their disruption of Raskin’s remarks as if a heckler’s veto were free speech. “What you saw play out actually was democracy and free speech and academic freedom,” he said. “From our perspective as a university, these are the difficult conversations that we should be having.”

    There was, of course, no real conversation because this was not the exercise but the denial of free speech. The protesters were engaging in “deplatforming,” which is common on our campuses, where students and faculty organize to prevent others from hearing opposing views.

    So, after years of Raskin encouraging the censorship of others, the mob finally came for him. The yawning response of the university was not unlike his own past response to journalists, professors and dissents who have come before his committee.

    The only “difficult” aspect of this conversation is for university figures like Pines who are called upon to defend the free speech rights of speakers or faculty. They need to show the courage and principle required to uphold the free speech commitment of higher education, even at the risk of being targeted themselves. That includes the sanctioning of students who prevent others from hearing opposing views in classrooms and event forums. These students have every right to protest outside such spaces, but higher education is premised on the free exchange of ideas. There is really no further “conversation” needed, just a letter of suspension or expulsion for those who deprive others of their rights.

    Deplatforming is the rage on our campuses. Universities often use it to cancel events for conservatives or controversial speakers. Often officials will sit idly by, refusing to remove protesters or deter disruptions. And that can lead to self-help measures by others.

    Last week, Walter Isaacson, former CEO of CNN and the Aspen Institute, was accused of assaulting a Tulane student protester, Rory MacDonald, during an event held off campus. Isaacson, 72, who teaches at Tulane, was attending the university-sponsored event and had had enough when MacDonald became the eighth protester to stop the event. He stood up and shoved MacDonald into the hall.

    MacDonald insisted that he and his fellow protesters were merely “peacefully interrupting” the event to stop others from speaking. He displayed slight scratch marks and is quoted as expressing a fear of returning to campus after the incident. Protests have been held on campus to have Isaacson fired.

    I have long criticized the growing anti-free speech movement in higher education. Yet these students have been taught for years that “speech is violence” and harmful. They have also been told by figures such as Pines that silencing others is an act of free speech. Academics and deans have said that there is no free speech protection for offensive or “disingenuous” speech. In one instance, former CUNY Law Dean Mary Lu Bilek insisted that disrupting a speech on free speech is itself free speech.

    Even schools that purportedly forbid such interruptions rarely punish students who engage in them. For example, students disrupted a Northwestern class due to a guest speaker from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (after the class had heard from an undocumented immigrant). The university let the protesters into the room after they promised not to disrupt the class. They proceeded to stop the class and then gave interviews to the media proudly disclosing their names and celebrating the cancellation. Northwestern did nothing beyond express “disappointment.”

    At Stanford, law students prevented a federal judge from speaking. When the judge asked for law school officials present to intervene, former Stanford DEI Dean Tirien Steinbach stepped forward and attacked the conservative judge for triggering the students by sharing his views. After a national outcry, Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne and Law School Dean Jenny Martinez issued a joint apology that notably did not include punishment for a single student.

    These schools are enablers of the anti-free speech movement as much as figures like Raskin.

    For years, academics supported such mobs or remained silent as their colleagues were cancelled or fired. Now they are suddenly discovering the value of free speech as the mob comes for them.

    Censorship and blacklisting create an insatiable appetite. While Democrats fostered such efforts to silence conservatives and dissenters on vaccines, climate change, abortion, transgenderism and other issues, they now find themselves pursued by the very mobs that they once led. Just two years ago, Biden was celebrated for denouncing social media executives as “killers” for allowing free speech. Now he, Raskin, and others are accused of killing others with “Zionist disinformation.”

    It is an epiphany that often comes too late. During the French Revolution, journalist Jacques Mallet du Pan remarked that “like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children.”

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 17:00
  44. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Ilana Mercer

    Inarguably, to condemn Israel’s industrial-scale campaign of slaughter and starvation in Gaza ought to be ethically straightforward. Basic really, for Israel is in violation of God’s law, natural justice, the laws of war and all customary international humanitarian law.

    That Israel is committing the “the crime of all crimes” against the Palestinians of Gaza is not within the realm of opinion.

    That the Global North is standing stock-still in the face of this well-documented holocaust is not in dispute.

    That the United States is an active participant in war crimes, funding and arming Israel in contravention of international humanitarian law , a plethora of US laws (having, without attached conditions, delivered more than 100 arms shipments to Israel since October 7), and the natural justice, articulated by Cicero as early as 106-43 B.C.: these are all fact.

    That America has provided the Jewish State with diplomatic cover—running interference for it, so that it may continue to its evil ends—until recently vetoing three (albeit symbolic) international attempts to stop Israel: this, too, is immutably true.

    Right and wrong are universal, not relative. The Sixth Commandment is not opinion, but a species of the inviolable natural law. Neither is it optional. “Thou shalt not murder” is called a commandment for a reason. There are no tribal privilege clauses attached to it. Like gentiles, Jews are enjoined against murder, to say nothing of mass murder.

    Yet Israelis now flout the Sixth Commandment with ugly audacity. They appear to believe that their sectarian supremacy transcends the universal moral order to which international law, the natural law and the Decalogue give expression.

    With its actions, so “conspicuous and outrageous,” Israel has “knocked the cosmos out of kilter” (a lovely line by novelist Kathryn Harrison). Such is the moral turpitude of the Israel Über Alles crowd—Jewish and gentile, stateside and abroad—that they appear incapable of distinguishing evidence from assertion, and facts from feel-good fiction; they can’t tell right from wrong. By necessity, then, any preface to an essay about Israel’s manifestly intentional annihilation of the Gaza Strip must turn into a primer in ethics.

    Clearly, if Israeli society is sick; then so are its cobelligerent backers and boosters.

    For throwing-up clouds of obfuscating sepia over its abstention vote on  the United Nations Security Council’s ceasefire resolution, March 25, the Biden Administration and its UN representative must be exposed.

    “Ceasefire” in previous U.S. drafts amounted to Orwellian NewSpeak. Having never once called for an immediate, unconditional ceasefire, the U.S. had perfunctorily predicated temporary ceasefire resolutions on the return of Israeli hostages. Whereas it was obligated morally to compel Israel to forthwith cease and desist its systematic and sustained onslaught on Gaza’s civilians; the US had opted, until March 25, to merely condition the temporary cessation of immoral and illegal mass murder of innocent Palestinians on the release of Israeli hostages, in effect tethering a “ceasefire” to the return of the Israeli hostages.

    Against the wishes of citizens of our country and the world, America has deployed its veto power, repeatedly and reliably, in previous United Nations Security Council votes, so as to prevent an immediate, unconditional cease-fire in Gaza.

    By so doing, America had conditioned the inalienable right to life of Palestinians on the return of Israeli hostages, in effect nullifying that inalienable right.

    Recognizing that the right to life of innocent men, women and children is unconditional; Security Council member states, aside the United States and its protégé Israel, had refused to tether the fate of Gaza to hostage negotiations.

    With pellucid logic, Amar Bendjama, Algeria’s ambassador to the U.N and the Arab bloc’s current Security Council member, had stated, February 20, 2024, that, “A vote in favor of [an unconditional ceasefire] is a support to the Palestinians’ right to life.” With its prior vetoes and current abstention, the US had nullified Palestinian right to life independent of the rights of Israeli hostages to the same.

    You can say that Gaza’s innocent civilians are being held hostage by Israel enablers Blinken, Biden and Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield.

    The general run of people around the world, however, are having none of this. We have been chanting “ceasefire” with catechetical promptness. The West’s “smart” set is belatedly getting the message that their constituents, decent citizens, are revolted by Israel’s acts and are in-revolt against supporting it.

    In response, and oh-so cynically, all Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield did on March 25 was to abstain from using American veto power to stop the good guys—China, Russia, Algeria and the rest of the 15-member UN Security Council—from demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza. That’s all.

    Expect the Biden Administration and its bi-partisan backers to keep gently cajoling brief lulls—conditional breaks—in the IDF’s bloodletting of a helpless, cornered civilian population.

    Covering its wretchedness with sanctimony; the U.S. had not vetoed the last ceasefire resolution; but had, nevertheless, worked to water it down. In its abstention vote, the US has “blocked action in the General Assembly under the Uniting for Peace resolution, where you could have seen some real meaningful action.”

    For moral compass scrambled; it’s hard to beat former ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley. In this protracted foreign-policy mirage, Blinken, Biden, Thomas-Greenfield and their political posse do Nikki Haley, a Republican, proud, for Trump’s appointee to the UN would have done nothing different.

    In the world of patronage, it doesn’t get much worse. The United States is at Israel’s elbow—it is a cobelligerent: In actively sustaining Israel’s armed forces, and running diplomatic interference for its politicians; America is acting as Israel’s “principal sponsor,” complicit in war crimes, signaling  to the Jewish State that it will let it continue to its evil endgame.

    As your columnist ventured in January, the issuance of the equivalent of a legal cease-and-desist or a restraining order against a violent offender, Israel, is urgent and long overdue. It’s already too late for Gaza as a habitable landmass.

    While progressives lauded the International Court of Justice (ICJ), my perspective about the Court’s indecision, some months back, was dimmer. (Disgust, actually.) Unfocused as I was on legalistic definitions of genocide; it was obvious to me that, what was indubitably mass murder and ethnic cleansing—crimes that are in process and ongoing—had to be stopped right away. A violent offender, a serial killer, must be stopped; not cautioned and observed!

    Were the International Court of Justice an effective and just organization it would have issued some sort of binding cease and desist order, some manner of restraining order, if you will, instructing the Israel Defense Forces to stop its depredations.

    Another international tribunal, the International Criminal Court (ICC), had “issued, in March of 2023, warrants of arrest, no less “for two individuals in the context of the situation in Ukraine,” one of whom was Mr. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, president of the Russian Federation, who was being sought for war crimes. With respect to Israel, the inept International Court of Justice appears compromised.

    For in a just society, the moral strictures that apply to the individual must also extend to the collective. Immoral acts that are forbidden separately cannot be sanctioned collectively. If the citizen must not murder; neither should The State, any state.

    In its uncontested superiority, the United States has asserted, moreover, that the UN ceasefire resolution is “non-binding.” “Completely false,” fumes international law expert Graig Mokhiber, in an interview, March 26, with Amy Goodman of “Democracy Now!” And I paraphrase Mr. Mokhiber:

    It is black-letter law in the U.N. Charter that all members of the United Nations are bound to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council. The Charter, in Article 25, and in subsequent decisions of the International Court of Justice, has made it indisputable that Security Council resolutions are binding for all member states.

    Not only is the last ceasefire resolution binding, but it opens up an opportunity, given that Israel is in breach of it, to table a resolution for enforcement under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, which “empowers the Security Council to orchestrate … collective actions … through a Military Staff Committee.”

    A Security Council resolution not defanged by the United States could include a call for corporeal action: diplomatic, military, political, the deployment of a protection force, and the establishment of a tribunal for future prosecution.

    If left to the rudderless Europeans and Americans—they’ve done not a thing to stop what Ron Unz has termed the first televised mass murder in history—it is for a heavenly tribunal that we will be waiting.

    Scars will knit, but the dead don’t rise, and spry young limbs won’t grow back. More than ten children lose their legs daily by the IDF. Spare a thought for the lot of these children hobbled for life, for the US and world leaders have not.

    Again, these judicial and political knaves and curs (with apologies to the canine community) could have cut off the supply of munitions to the culprits. (Some have. God bless Canada for placing an embargo on the export of kayaks and maple syrup to Israel.) Without Americans (you and me, the taxpayers); Israel would not last a day in its brave battle against mothers and their babies.

    In essence, stop murdering and maiming Palestinians, no conditions attached.

    ***

    Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian think piece since 1999. Her new book is ‘The Paleolibertarian Guide To Deep Tech, Deep Pharma & The Aberrant Economy’(February, 2024). She’s the author of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa” (2011)), and other books. Mercer is described as “a system-builder. Distilled, her modus operandi has been to methodically apply first principles to the day’s events.”

  45. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Alex Schadenberg
    Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

    Euthanasia and assisted suicide are currently being debated in England, Scotland, Ireland, Jersey and the Isle of Man. Each jurisdiction is debating a different proposal.

    Sonia SodhaSonia Sodha wrote an excellent opinion column that was published in the Guardian on April 7, 2024. Sodha wonder who will step in to save the most at risk? and she states: Proponents of legalising assisted dying are right to stop and think of the possible unintended consequences. Sodha explains:
    It’s rare to get a politician who openly admits they are torn on an issue, but in recent days there have been two striking examples. First, Wes Streeting, Labour’s shadow health secretary, admitted that though he voted to legalise assisted dying a few years ago, he feels conflicted. Then Nicola Sturgeon, former Scottish first minister, wrote a piece saying that, with new Scottish legislation on the table, the reservations she expected to subside are becoming stronger.Sodha also supported euthanasia but has now changed her position. Sodha explains:
    A decade ago, I would have supported assisted dying out of a respect for personal autonomy and a desire to alleviate suffering. Today, I understand these objectives are not standalone but need to be weighed against the impact on those for whom an abstract liberal notion like autonomy is highly simplistic, and the state-sanctioned wrongful deaths that seem to me impossible to avoid.Sodha further explains why she now opposes euthanasia:
    The first prompt for my reappraisal has been my evolving understanding of the complexity of relationships. We are not all autonomous islands floating in a sea of humanity; we are highly influenced by each other and by cultural norms. Writing about domestic abuse has opened my eyes to the extent that coercively controlling relationships drive people to do things because others want them to. Of course there will be women who get a terminal diagnosis, whose partners have been emotionally abusive to them for years – telling them their life isn’t worth living – who will come under intolerable pressure to opt for assisted dying. How can we ignore that around a third of female suicides are thought to be related to intimate partner abuse? Or that some men who violently kill their sick wives rely on defences such as “mercy killing” and “suicide pacts”, sometimes very effectively? Even the fact that men are much more likely than women to leave their partners after a terminal diagnosis feels salient to understanding the gendered implications.
    Sodha explains how the risk of coercion is a wider issue:
    The risk of coercion goes beyond intimate partners in a society riven with ageism and anti-disability prejudice; what happened to older people in care homes during Covid is just one example. More than a fifth of people over 65 have experienced physical, emotional, financial or sexual abuse. There are relatives who will find ways – perhaps quite subtly, even unintentionally – of hinting to people with a terminal diagnosis who need round-the-clock care that they should opt for assisted dying. How would that make you feel? Almost half of people who chose assisted death in Oregon in 2022 cited concern about being a burden.

    Then there is the internal pressure that arises from some feeling that they ought to do it to save relatives difficulty and financial consequences: where the right to die becomes the duty to die. That message will be reinforced at a societal level; Times columnist Matthew Parris recently argued in a widely condemned column that assisted dying could help address the cost of an ageing population; that there are those willing to be honest about this should give serious pause for thought. Moreover, palliative care doctors talk about how the wish to die is not stable, and often abates in terminally ill patients in the wake of an initial diagnosis, and can be affected by depression, which is hard to diagnose.Sodha then refers to the International evidence with legalised euthanasia.
    The most cited example is Canada, where a limited form of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalised in 2016 for people with “grievous and irremediable medical conditions” with assurances about its narrow scope. Today, that definition has been interpreted to include a person with severe sensitivities to chemicals unable to access appropriate housing from the state, and there have been reports of officials promoting assisted dying to people with disabilities applying for government assistance and medical professionals trying to coerce people into it. A parliamentary committee has recommended MAiD should be extended to some sick children and it is set to be expanded to people with chronic mental illness. In the Netherlands, euthanasia is an option for people who are autistic and lonely and is about to be extended to children of all ages. In Oregon, where the law has remained more stable, terminal conditions today include arthritis and anorexia.Sodha comments on the House of Lords debate that assured people that safeguards can be maintained. Sodha writes:
    Medical professionals are not trained in or necessarily any good at detecting coercive control; judges will have limited evidence to make their own call. In the family courts, judges can fail to detect coercive control even when confronted with detailed evidence about intra-familial relationships. Narcissistic abusers can be highly adept at fooling professionals. What level of outside influence is considered too much, how is it measured, and how sure must a judge be, given life and death is at stake, surely rendering the balance of probability evidentiary threshold usually applied in the family courts inappropriate?
    Sadha criticized the House of Lords debate by writing:
    In the House of Lords debate, there was a marked failure to engage with these detailed concerns. Some claimed there is no evidence of problems abroad, as if coercively influenced wrongful deaths would magically reveal themselves after the fact. One only need look at the fight to reveal the true number of hidden homicides of women by their abusers to understand the naivety in that and, in somewhere like Oregon, the system is simply not set up to catch wrongful deaths. With brutal utilitarian honesty, former supreme court president Lord Neuberger acknowledged there would be abuses, but argued the benefits for those acting autonomously would outweigh them.Sodha concludes by challenging politicians to examine the complexity of the issue. She writes:
    We live in a social media-driven world characterised by excessive moral certainty, in which powerful individual stories that invoke strong emotions can dominate the discourse to the detriment of the voiceless. There is a real risk that a law gets passed without any of these devastating concerns being addressed. Assisted dying is not a right-left issue, but it garners more support from MPs on the left, including Keir Starmer, and a Labour government might feel under pressure to introduce big reforms that don’t cost money given its self-imposed fiscal constraints. That is why voices like Streeting’s and Sturgeon’s are so important; we desperately need politicians willing to acknowledge that assisted dying is one of the most complex and fraught ethical questions they will ever be asked to confront.
    More articles on this topic:
    • Warning to Ireland. If euthanasia is legalized as a cure for suffering, then suffering people will be "cured" by euthanasia! (Link). 
    • Autistic healthy 28-year-old Dutch woman scheduled to die by euthanasia (Link). 
    • Netherlands 2023 euthanasia report. A 23% increase in euthanasia for psychological suffering (Link).
  46. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Here's Why "America Is Broken" And People Are Worried

    The NY Times on Monday published an opinion piece by UPenn senior lecturer and Open Society Project senior fellow (!) Damon Linker titled "Why Is Biden Struggling? Because America Is Broken."

    And while it's more or less a recap of what ZeroHedge readers have known for years, the essay provides a sobering dose of reality for the "You should really watch Rachel Maddow" types.

    Seven months away from a rematch election pitting President Biden against former President Donald Trump, the incumbent is struggling. Mr. Biden suffers from persistently low approval ratings, he barely manages to tie Mr. Trump in national head-to-head polls and he lags behind the former president in most of the swing states where the election will be decided (despite some recent modestly encouraging movement in his direction).

    The question is why. -NY Times

    Biden's defenders, and the administration itself, has chalked the president's unpopularity up to "a failure of communication," however Linker instead suggests "It's usually wiser to listen to what voters are saying" (beyond the obvious concerns about the president's age).

    'Too Numerous to List'

    Citing a January 2021 essay in Tablet titled "Everything Is Broken," and a follow-up essay by the same author, Alana Newhsouse, who wrote that "whole parts of American society were breaking down before our eyes," Linker encapsulates why Americans are so pissed (h/t Dean Baker):

    The examples are almost too numerous to list: a disastrous war in Iraq; a ruinous financial crisis followed by a decade of anemic growth when most of the new wealth went to those who were already well off; a shambolic response to the deadliest pandemic in a century; a humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan; rising prices and interest rates; skyrocketing levels of public and private debt; surging rates of homelessness and the spread of tent encampments in American cities; undocumented migrants streaming over the southern border; spiking rates of gun violence, mental illness, depression, addiction, suicide, chronic illness and obesity, coupled with a decline in life expectancy.

    That’s an awful lot of failure over the past 20-odd years. Yet for the most part, the people who run our institutions have done very little to acknowledge or take responsibility for any of it, let alone undertake reforms that aim to fix what’s broken. -NYT

    Linker then writes that the above is why "angry anti-establishment populism has become so prominent in our politics over the past decade," which both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders have capitalized on.

    And Biden, a career politician, has been part of the problem (and therefore implicated in these abject societal failures), and is "badly out of step with the national mood, speaking a language very far removed from the talk of a broken country that suffuses Mr. Trump’s meandering and often unhinged remarks on the subject." (gotta get that shot in!)

    That leaves Mr. Biden as the lone institutionalist defender of the status quo surrounded by a small army of brokenists looking for support from an electorate primed to respond to their more downcast message.

    Linker suggests that in order to recover, Biden 'stop being so upbeat' - about the economy in particular, and stop making the election about how awful Trump is. Biden "should admit Washington has gotten a lot of things wrong over the past two decades and sound unhappy about and humbled by it."

    Further, Biden "could make the argument that all governments make mistakes because they are run by fallible human beings — but also point out that elected representatives in a democracy should be up front about error and resolve to learn from mistakes so that they avoid them in the future."

    "Just acknowledging how much in America is broken could generate a lot of good will from otherwise skeptical and dismissive voters," Linker suggests.

    Let's see how that goes.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 16:40
  47. Site: LifeNews
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Steven Ertelt

    Pope Francis today issued a landmark statement called “Infinite Dignity” that condemns concerning practices such as surrogacy and euthanasia.

    The new 20-page declaration Dignitas Infinitaor “Infinite Dignity,” has the Catholic Church proclaiming that “gender theory” plays into “the age-old temptation to make oneself God” as well as that “sex change” surgery is a threat to human dignity.

    “In the light of Revelation, the Church resolutely reiterates and confirms the ontological dignity of the human person, created in the image and likeness of God and redeemed in Jesus Christ,” the document declares at its beginning.

    “Regarding gender theory, whose scientific coherence is the subject of considerable debate among experts, the Church recalls that human life in all its dimensions, both physical and spiritual, is a gift from God,” the document stated.

    “This gift is to be accepted with gratitude and placed at the service of the good. Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes, apart from this fundamental truth that human life is a gift, amounts to a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God, entering into competition with the true God of love revealed to us in the Gospel.”

    The Catholic Church also opposed surrogacy, “through which the immensely worthy child becomes a mere object.”

    Follow LifeNews on the MeWe social media network for the latest pro-life news free from Facebook’s censorship!

    Quoting from Pope Francis, the document stated, “I deem deplorable the practice of so-called surrogate motherhood, which represents a grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child, based on the exploitation of situations of the mother’s material needs.”

    “A child is always a gift and never the basis of a commercial contract. Consequently, I express my hope for an effort by the international community to prohibit this practice universally,” the document read.

    On the controversial issues of assisted suicide and euthanasia, the document continues the longstanding Catholic teachings against ending human life. The new document says both are not “consistent with respect for the dignity of the human person.”

    “There is a special case of human dignity violation that is quieter but is swiftly gaining ground. It is unique in how it utilizes a mistaken understanding of human dignity to turn the concept of dignity against life itself. This confusion is particularly evident today in discussions surrounding euthanasia,” the Vatican said.

    The document comes on the 75th aniversary of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Catholic Church emphasized a need to place “respect for the dignity of the human person beyond all circumstances” to be placed in the “center of every legal system.”

    The post Pope Francis Issues Landmark Statement “Infinite Dignity” Condemning Surrogacy and Euthanasia appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  48. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "Have You Checked If Your Hair Is On Fire Today?"

    Authored by James Howard Kunstler via Kunstler.com,

    Bang-and-Whimper

    “Whoever doesn’t miss the Soviet Union doesn’t have a heart. Whoever wants it back doesn’t have a brain.”

    - VV Putin

    Have you checked if your hair is on fire today? Here comes an eclipse of the sun. Our moon will cast a totality of its shadow in a path about 100 miles wide arcing from Del Rio Texas to Bangor Maine, with lesser effects outward on each side of the path so that night will seem to fall at mid-day over most of America east of the Big Muddy. This event typically freaks out primitive peoples, and brings out the latent archaic terror even in supposedly civilized minds, reminding us in a powerfully spooky way that the cosmos runs things, not us puny humans.

    You might ask: Are we hostages to cycles, Astronomical, Kondratieff, the Maunder Minimum, Fourth Turning, the Great Wave. . .?  Considering the feckless doings of our own society, we seem to be yielding to some final act of cosmic punishment.

    What is not falling apart? Our livelihoods? Our politics? Our money system? Our morals? Our common sense, our families, our relations with other societies, our infrastructure, our culture, our business models, our education, our medicine?

    Alas, our government still lurches along, gone mad-dog on its citizens as it desperately sucks all power and resources unto its inner engine like a red giant star preparing for death.

    Today is also the end of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting, prayer, atonement, and reflection.

    What follows this pause in the troubled Middle East, a.k.a. Armageddonville? I daresay most adult citizens of sore-beset America actually don’t care. . . can’t care, because they have trouble enough of their own keeping a roof overhead, a car on the road, and food on the table.

    The Woke-Marxist college kids are wailing over the actions of Israel in Gaza — as they will for anyone within their dumb-ass equation of victims-and-oppressors, especially involving brown and white people. It is a brutal operation in Gaza, for sure, but so was the Hamas act-of-war on October 7 that many want to forget about now. They still hold and torture hostages, you know.

    I doubt that Israel wants to exterminate the Gazans, but at this point they would probably like to export them to other nations that share their Arab culture. Those other Arab nations are not eager to take in the Gazans. The fractious minority in the USA who militate against Israel because, you know, the Jews, never ask if the Palestinians have some other plan, some other position other than From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free! — meaning Death to Israel. Can you name any alternate proposal they have proffered? No, because there is none.

    Not only have they no intention of getting along somehow with Israel, but they give every sign that they prefer to continue making war on her one way or another: rocket attacks, café bombings, rape and murder ops. Because they’re oppressed. They might have turned their 40 kilometers of Mediterranean beach-front into a world-beating resort, but instead they spent billions in international aid building a tunnel network and purchasing arms to wage war against Israel. And with October 7, they got war.

    So, the rest of the world is very concerned now that this will lead to World War Three, world wars being the grand prize at the end of many historical cycles.

    Of course, the Iranians have been chanting Death to Israel in so many words for decades, so no one can mistake Iran’s intentions. And Iran has funded and deployed Hezbollah military bases on Israel’s northern frontier with Lebanon. They are said to have thousands of high-tech rockets capable of decimating Tel Aviv. Everybody knows that launching such an operation could result, ten minutes later, in Tehran becoming an ashtray.

    And what if Mr. Netanyahu launches a peremptory attack against southern Lebanon to destroy those bases? Does Iran ride to the rescue? And does Russia ride to Iran’s rescue? And does China rush in to secure the sea lanes in the Persian Gulf and the oil refineries of Iran that Israel doesn’t manage to blow up? And what does the USA do? Or Europe (watching much of its oil supply go off-line)? Looks World War Three-ish, a little bit.

    There is also, lest we forget, the mess in Ukraine, another world war flashpoint.

    There, the stark reality is that Russia is in control of the tactical situation on the ground. The WEF syndicate’s project — fronted by NATO — to weaken Russia and eventually loot its resources is a flop. The indignities heaped on Russia in sanctions and foolish objurgations will not be forgotten. There will be a Great Reset for Europe, but not the one it ordered. Not the nirvana of transhumanism and social control; rather a cold plunge into neo-medieval poverty, the breakup of large states, and a shocking simplification of daily life.

    Everything that the USA and NATO are doing these days is pretense: pretending that they have the military mojo to directly enter the Ukraine War; pretending to continue pouring money into the hopeless and unnecessary conflict; pretending that the ill-conceived project even matters. The hidden truth now is that the USA war blob needs to cut its losses in Ukraine and wants to bug out. The trouble is: how to do that in a way that does not amount to another gross American strategic humiliation? That’s Russia’s problem, too: how to adroitly work the conclusion of this fiasco in a way that doesn’t humiliate the USA to the degree that we resort to some new act of geopolitical insanity in compensation. Do you remember the half century when Ukraine was indisputably within Russia’s sphere-of-influence and was not a problem for the world? I assure you this was so, and will have to be again. It will be all right.

    So, if you are among those who believe that the cosmos seeks to convey an occult message in this eclipse that will supernaturally darken half our country today, maybe it’s this one: just stop it, America!

    Stop meddling in every flashpoint across the planet. Look to yourself and your own monstrous problems: your jive-tragic government, your fake economy, your breached borders, your sick-and-depressed population, your racketeering corporations, your broken banks, your buggered election methods, your faithless news media, your political mental illness.

    Or else, get ready for bang-and-whimper.

    *  *  *

    Support his blog by visiting Jim’s Patreon Page or Substack

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 16:20
  49. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Netanyahu Says Date Set For Rafah Ground Offensive

    Update(1615ET): Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that a date has been set for the planned Israeli military ground offensive against the southern city of Rafah. His statement comes less than 24 hours after the IDF announced it is in the process of pulling troops from Khan Younis.

    "Today I received a detailed report on the talks in Cairo, we are constantly working to achieve our goals, first and foremost the release of all our hostages and achieving a complete victory over Hamas," Netanyahu said in a video message on X.

    "This victory requires entry into Rafah and the elimination of the terrorist battalions there. It will happen, there is a date," he added. However, the Biden administration has as yet not been satisfied with an Israeli plan to evacuate civilians first. Biden and Netanyahu are still openly at odds over the planned Rafah offensive. 

    Part of Biden's Democratic base is in revolt over the Rafah situation, and the White House is under pressure. Increasingly, people have seen through the Biden administration's meaningless expresses of 'concern' over the soaring civilian death toll in Gaza. 

    Rafah, currently packed with some 1.4 million people, mostly refugees, via Reuters.

    Last month, Israeli officials said the Rafah offensive would start near the end of Ramadan, and this still could be the case. Assuming the IDF goes forward with it, it will be interesting to see what the Biden White House says. It's increasingly obvious that Netanyahu is in the driver's seat and Biden is exasperated. 

    * * *

    Israel's military has confirmed that for the first time it is actually pulling troops from southern Gaza instead of adding them. Specifically ground forces are being withdrawn from Khan Younis following months of intense fighting which has destroyed much of the city.

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced Sunday that its 98th division had "concluded its mission" there and that the division is being withdrawn from the Gaza Strip to "recuperate and prepare for future operations."

    Via Reuters

    However, there's no firm indicators that the planned Raffah assault is off, amid ongoing pressure from the Biden administration not to move forward, with the IDF also saying that "a significant force led by the 162nd division and the Nahal brigade continues to operate in the Gaza strip, and will preserve the IDF’s freedom of action and its ability to conduct precise intelligence based operations."

    But this withdrawal and lull was enough to see oil prices briefly decline from a five month high, also on hopes that Iran's inaction so far means a massive retaliatory attack in response to last week's Israeli attack on the Damascus embassy might not be coming.

    Bloomberg said in a Sunday note that "Brent futures tumbled by as much as 2.6% before clawing back some losses to trade near $90 a barrel"--and on Monday pushing back above $90. West Texas Intermediate briefly fell below $86 on the headlines suggesting cooling of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, before regaining.

    "Oil has rallied recently on escalating tensions in the Middle East and supply shocks, raising the prospect of the global benchmark reaching triple figures," the report said. "Trading of call options that profit from higher prices was the second-busiest on record on Friday."

    Israel also appears newly committed to a fresh round of truce talks in Qatar, with the Mossad chief reportedly leading an Israeli delegation back to the talks, after previously quitting with no progress made. As for the troop withdrawal, CNN has observed, "A CNN team along the border where troops enter and leave Gaza has not yet seen large numbers of troops withdraw, but it has seen a large number of tanks pull out of Khan Younis overnight. They are now stationed on the border of Gaza and Israel."

    But the price decline is also looking ahead to three greatly anticipated reports on the state of the global oil market due out this week. On Tuesday Energy Information Administration’s Short-Term Energy Outlook is issued, followed by OPEC’s latest Monthly Oil Market Report on Thursday, and then the International Energy Agency’s Oil Market Report set to be issued Friday.

    IG analyst Tony Sycamore told Reuters of the start of the week price retreat, "It appears the catalyst is Israel saying it has withdrawn all troops except one brigade from the Southern Gaza strip, likely in response to growing international pressure and to deescalate tensions after it killed senior Iranian commanders in Syria last week."

    As for a potential Iranian response to the embassy attack, Israeli commanders are still bracing, with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant having stressed the country is prepared for any scenario.

    Following a meeting with senior officers this weekend, Gallant told reporters that "the defense establishment has completed preparations for responses in the event of any scenario that may develop vis-à-vis Iran."

    Tyler Durden Mon, 04/08/2024 - 16:15
  50. Site: LifeNews
    3 weeks 5 days ago
    Author: Frank Pavone

    Priests for Life National Director Frank Pavone today thanked President Donald Trump for his statement on abortion released on his Truth Social account.

    “As I said in my remarks recently at Mar-a-Lago, Donald J. Trump has been, and will be again, the most pro-life president our country has seen. He has not wavered on any of the pro-life positions or executive actions he has taken (including depriving the abortion industry of federal funds), or judges he has appointed, and we will again see such progress in a second term.

    “President Trump is rightly proud of his role in the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Roe blocked the American people from protecting the unborn. Now, we can protect them again, and are doing so.

    “By invoking ‘the will of the people,’ President Trump is pointing to the fact that courts are not here to impose a dogma of abortion-on-demand. Rather, the courts should step out of the way so that the people can have an open and honest debate about abortion. That’s what we will continue to do.

    “President Trump’s announcement of the abortion policy he would pursue as president calls to mind the drafting of the U.S. Constitution at a time when slavery was still legal,” Pavone said. “The Founders understood that they could not get the Constitution ratified if it contained an absolute anti-slavery position. They needed to get the nation started.

    Follow LifeNews on the MeWe social media network for the latest pro-life news free from Facebook’s censorship!

    “But with the Constitution they did adopt, they put in place the very mechanism by which slavery was in fact ultimately abolished.

    “President Trump is taking a similar stance. We have to save the nation by winning this election. Right now we have a nation divided on abortion. But by saving the nation itself from destruction by the Democrats – by saving the Constitution, free and fair elections, freedom of speech and religion, and by stopping the extremism of the Democrats on abortion — we will in fact preserve the very mechanism by which we can continue to build a culture of life.

    “I thank the President for his statement but I don’t expect him to do my job; I expect him to do his. My job and the job of the pro-life movement is to lay out the moral absolute of the right to life, which does not admit of compromise. Pro-life leaders, meeting recently for strategic planning, issued this joint statement that reflects the pro-life work that needs to be done in the next seven months.

    “We look forward to continuing to work together with President Trump and countless citizens to leading our nation to ever greater fidelity to its founding principle that governments are instituted precisely to preserve the unalienable right to life.”

    LifeNews.com Note:  Frank Pavone is the national director for Priests for Life.

    The post Ending Abortion Begins With Getting Rid of Pro-Abortion Radical Joe Biden appeared first on LifeNews.com.

Pages

Subscribe to Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds